blue.behind.enemy.lines
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jan 2012
- Messages
- 141
Ive opened Pandora's box aha, what have I done!?
blue.behind.enemy.lines said:Ive opened Pandora's box aha, what have I done!?
Skashion said:Well done Franny, we all thought you were an idiot at the time but this is a supreme example of targeting an investor and understood that those investors would win us a title so we could use three stars in advance.
The Kippaxkid said:I always thought it was a Pheonix (to represent rising from the ashes). Ah well, Golden Eagle it is then.
Mugatu said:The Kippaxkid said:I always thought it was a Pheonix (to represent rising from the ashes). Ah well, Golden Eagle it is then.
It is a Phoenix. That's what the club stated when they redesigned the badge anyway.
Mugatu said:It is a Phoenix. That's what the club stated when they redesigned the badge anyway.The Kippaxkid said:I always thought it was a Pheonix (to represent rising from the ashes). Ah well, Golden Eagle it is then.
you'd better let the council know mate - I'm sure they could get some cash in to help us poor taxpayers by fining City for a serious heraldic offenceIn 1958 the first official crest was issued by the City, this included the often missed Helm and Mantling. It added in the Mantling a Golden Eagle on a Crown. The Eagle was included to represent the importance of the Aero Industry and the crowns represent the enlarging community of Manchester.
Mugatu said:The Kippaxkid said:I always thought it was a Pheonix (to represent rising from the ashes). Ah well, Golden Eagle it is then.
It is a Phoenix. That's what the club stated when they redesigned the badge anyway.
Blue Jew said:You do wonder where some people get their information from.
The Manchester City Council website is not written by blues...(or perhaps it is!)Mugatu said:Blue Jew said:You do wonder where some people get their information from.
Well I can see where you get yours from. We can all Google Wikipedia entries mate, me included.
But what I'm going off with the Phoenix reference is something I remember the club saying when the badge was changed... now maybe my memory fails me, I'm quite happy to be corrected. I just don't take everything on Wikipedia as gospel seeing as many football club entries are written by fans, I'd be happier to see something like a press release from the time, that's all.
johnny crossan said:The Manchester City Council website is not written by blues...(or perhaps it is!)
Mugatu said:Blue Jew said:You do wonder where some people get their information from.
Well I can see where you get yours from. We can all Google Wikipedia entries mate, me included.
But what I'm going off with the Phoenix reference is something I remember the club saying when the badge was changed... now maybe my memory fails me, I'm quite happy to be corrected. I just don't take everything on Wikipedia as gospel seeing as many football club entries are written by fans, I'd be happier to see something like a press release from the time, that's all.
have you tried reading this thread from the start ?Blue Jew said:Mugatu said:Blue Jew said:You do wonder where some people get their information from.
Well I can see where you get yours from. We can all Google Wikipedia entries mate, me included.
But what I'm going off with the Phoenix reference is something I remember the club saying when the badge was changed... now maybe my memory fails me, I'm quite happy to be corrected. I just don't take everything on Wikipedia as gospel seeing as many football club entries are written by fans, I'd be happier to see something like a press release from the time, that's all.
Wrong!!!! I agree with you re Wikipedia which is exactly why neither of those statements about the redsigned crest came from there. You can do all the research you want and each time the story comes out the same, it's an eagle. If you want to beleive something you vaguely remember from fifteen years ago instead of what is widely held to be the case that's your prerogative. In the abscence of a club statement from 1997, here's some more thoughts on the design from different sources:
The crest we see now was introduced in 1997. The reasons for this seem to vary a little, and it would be good to see if anybody can shed some light on the actual reason? Anyway, back to the badge. It is based on the arms of the city, and consists of the shield in front of a golden eagle. The shield, in detail, features a ship on its upper half representing the Manchester ship canal, and three diagonal stripes in the lower half, for the city’s three rivers. The bottom of the badge holds the motto ‘Superbia in Proelio’ (the ‘correct’ spelling of this seems to be hotly debated) , and if my beginner’s Latin serves me well, it translates to ‘Pride in Battle’.
And this:
My first gripe is that the eagle looks too much like the back of US quarter, or worse, a Nazi symbol. According to the original press release, the eagle was "taken from the Badge of the City of Manchester, dating from 1957". I'm not sure which badge this refers to, as Manchester has been using the same coat of arms since 1842 (pictured lower down) and that certainly doesn't contain an eagle.
johnny crossan said:have you tried reading this thread from the start ?Blue Jew said:Mugatu said:Well I can see where you get yours from. We can all Google Wikipedia entries mate, me included.
But what I'm going off with the Phoenix reference is something I remember the club saying when the badge was changed... now maybe my memory fails me, I'm quite happy to be corrected. I just don't take everything on Wikipedia as gospel seeing as many football club entries are written by fans, I'd be happier to see something like a press release from the time, that's all.
Wrong!!!! I agree with you re Wikipedia which is exactly why neither of those statements about the redsigned crest came from there. You can do all the research you want and each time the story comes out the same, it's an eagle. If you want to beleive something you vaguely remember from fifteen years ago instead of what is widely held to be the case that's your prerogative. In the abscence of a club statement from 1997, here's some more thoughts on the design from different sources:
The crest we see now was introduced in 1997. The reasons for this seem to vary a little, and it would be good to see if anybody can shed some light on the actual reason? Anyway, back to the badge. It is based on the arms of the city, and consists of the shield in front of a golden eagle. The shield, in detail, features a ship on its upper half representing the Manchester ship canal, and three diagonal stripes in the lower half, for the city’s three rivers. The bottom of the badge holds the motto ‘Superbia in Proelio’ (the ‘correct’ spelling of this seems to be hotly debated) , and if my beginner’s Latin serves me well, it translates to ‘Pride in Battle’.
And this:
My first gripe is that the eagle looks too much like the back of US quarter, or worse, a Nazi symbol. According to the original press release, the eagle was "taken from the Badge of the City of Manchester, dating from 1957". I'm not sure which badge this refers to, as Manchester has been using the same coat of arms since 1842 (pictured lower down) and that certainly doesn't contain an eagle.
![]()
- you'll never know what you might find!