Pablo Zabaleta - 2016/17 performances

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sagna should have started the last 2 games SIMPLE.

Zaba is my hero but he should only be used to give Sagna a rest.

Clichy should also be 1st
Choice imo.

Sagna. Stones Otamendi Clichy
That's my back 4 too. While Sagna and Clichy are even weaker on the ball than the alternative, defensively they are much more solid. At least that's how I see it.
 
That's my back 4 too. While Sagna and Clichy are even weaker on the ball than the alternative, defensively they are much more solid. At least that's how I see it.

Agree with both of you. I think that backline sets us up to have Zaba and Aleks as the subs with Kolarov able to play either LCB or LB. We have enough quality going forward we shouldn't be picking our fullbacks based on that, it should be defending and passing. Clichy and Sagna are the best pair for what we need
 
Got to agree with you, however I still have reservations about Otamendi and his diving in. How got lucky yesterday, that yellow he got for diving in, off his feet yet again should have been his 2d yellow, he got away with that handball.
Otemendi is the best of what we have. Kompany is all but finished imo & Mangala just can't play the Pep way it would be heart in mouths.

Bellerin would be the top of my shopping list & it's a must get centre half to play alongside Stones.
 
Agree with both of you. I think that backline sets us up to have Zaba and Aleks as the subs with Kolarov able to play either LCB or LB. We have enough quality going forward we shouldn't be picking our fullbacks based on that, it should be defending and passing. Clichy and Sagna are the best pair for what we need

Agreed again. Hoping that Pep will bring through 2 'home grown' young full backs over the next few months - Zabba in particular will be moved on, as will Kolarov, unless he is perceived as valuable for his newly discovered expertise as a ball playing lcb.
 
It was strange playing Zaba and Kolarov away at Spurs, especially as they lack pace against Spurs' pace.

Clichy is much better on the ball than Kolarov, again something that would have helped us to bypass Spurs' initial press.
 
It was strange playing Zaba and Kolarov away at Spurs, especially as they lack pace against Spurs' pace.

Clichy is much better on the ball than Kolarov, again something that would have helped us to bypass Spurs' initial press.

I agree completely, a popular misconception that kolorov is better on the ball than Clichy.

Kolorov only has a booming left foot which can deliver defense splitting passes and nice through balls. This is the only aspect where kolorov trumps Clichy.
Clichy can also deliver the through balls.

His lack of crossing ability is not exposed in Peps system and given time will definitely shine .
 
It was strange playing Zaba and Kolarov away at Spurs, especially as they lack pace against Spurs' pace.

Clichy is much better on the ball than Kolarov, again something that would have helped us to bypass Spurs' initial press.

I guess we have to think that Pep's only seen Kolarov play in a handful of games and to be fair, apart from the Celtic game, he's been very good. Pep hasn't seen the utter garbage we've witnessed for 3 seasons.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.