I fully agree that times were different. And City do seem to have acted in relation to your coach. The allegation with Bennell seems to be that the club had, at the least, reasons to look into his behaviour, but didn't because we considered him someone who would channel gifted young footballers into our youth set up.
This comes from the story in today's Times, the comments being from a man who came forward 20 years ago to disclose that he'd been abused by Bennell:
Now, reports are suggesting that there are large numbers of victims associated with clubs across the country and there are many abusers, not just one bad apple in the guy who's been named so far. If that's right and assuming City were guilty of turning a blind eye to Bennell in the way that Ian Ackley suggests, I'd strongly suspect that we were far from the only club taking that line, but that's no mitigation.
The heat is on us at the moment because there aren't many convicted abusers associated with football. What the media can say about other cases and other individuals is limited because they may result in police investigations and criminal proceedings down the line, while it's also potentially highly defamatory when the evidence at this stage probably amounts to one person's word against another's.
Bennell isn't going to sue for libel. He's a proven paedophile with multiple criminal convictions and doesn't have a reputation left to damage.
EDIT - An unnamed ex-Newcastle player has contacted police to say he was abused by a convicted paedophile in the north east who was once a "highly respected coach in youth circles". Wonder if more if his victims will come forward:
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/nov/24/george-ormond?CMP=share_btn_tw