Paper p**ck

stonerblue

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 May 2004
Messages
39,619
Location
Still alive here....
Some twat called bascombe writng for the telegraph




Manchester City’s night of triumph against Bayern Munich ended in farce as Manuel Pellegrini and his players misunderstood goal difference rules and sacrificed a late opportunity to top their Champions League group.
City recovered from two goals down in the Allianz Arena to beat the ­European champions 3-2, but had they scored one more in the closing stages they would have avoided a potential nightmare draw in the knockout stage.
Pellegrini’s side was tasked with bettering the 3-1 loss they suffered to Bayern at the Etihad, and while that was broadly considered to be a 3-0 win, a 4-2 victory would have sufficed courtesy of superior away goals.

Midfielder James Milner, who scored the winner, admitted the ­players thought they needed a 5-2 win. It was evident from post-match comments from manager Pellegrini that he too did not know a 4-2 win would have been enough.

When Milner put City ahead, ­Pellegrini made a tactical change by taking off David Silva and Edin Dzeko and his team played on the counter-attack in the closing stages.
Milner, an outstanding performer on the night, said: “We didn’t know if 4-2 would be enough or if we would need 5-2. We thought it needed to be 5-2 to be honest. It’s not easy to score three goals here, so to score four would have been a tough task. It’s pleasing to score three goals at a place like this and we’re going to need to do that in the next round.
“We’re slightly disappointed we did not finish top of the group. But to be slightly disappointed at beating ­Bayern Munich in their own ground is pretty pleasing.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...ity-chance-to-top-Champions-League-group.html
 
Re: Paper prick

All agenda nonsense aside, what did you seriously think they would say in relation to that supposed gaff? If you thought the papers would ignore it then you are naive. It doesn't take anything away from the win for anyone, but of course they were going to pick up on it, they would whoever had said it from any club. That's what the press do.
 
Re: Paper prick

For me the only way to decide who wins a group if both teams are level is, [1] goal difference [2] head to head, now if each team as beaten the other and can't be separated on goal difference between the two, then goal difference overall should come into play.
 
Re: Paper prick

Pigeonho said:
All agenda nonsense aside, what did you seriously think they would say in relation to that supposed gaff? If you thought the papers would ignore it then you are naive. It doesn't take anything away from the win for anyone, but of course they were going to pick up on it, they would whoever had said it from any club. That's what the press do.

You are correct pidge but I not so sure the coverage would be the same if the rags had come from 2 goals behind on the home turf of Bayern to register a stunning win.
I think the focus would else where to be honest.
 
Re: Paper prick

Ha ha, in another paper there headline in the football pull out is about Milner being the only English player to have scored a champions league goal for city, they will really pick up on anything rather than give us credit, if United would have beaten bayern last night after being 2 0 down inside 15 minutes, headlines would be about them sending shock waves around Europe etc etc
 
Re: Paper prick

tommo74 said:
Ha ha, in another paper there headline in the football pull out is about Milner being the only English player to have scored a champions league goal for city, they will really pick up on anything rather than give us credit, if United would have beaten bayern last night after being 2 0 down inside 15 minutes, headlines would be about them sending shock waves around Europe etc etc





has pige passed this post
 
Re: Paper prick

Pigeonho said:
All agenda nonsense aside, what did you seriously think they would say in relation to that supposed gaff? If you thought the papers would ignore it then you are naive. It doesn't take anything away from the win for anyone, but of course they were going to pick up on it, they would whoever had said it from any club. That's what the press do.

It deserves a mention in a match report. Not to be the main talking point from the game. Its just shit stirring the over reaction to this.
 
Re: Paper prick

moomba said:
Pigeonho said:
All agenda nonsense aside, what did you seriously think they would say in relation to that supposed gaff? If you thought the papers would ignore it then you are naive. It doesn't take anything away from the win for anyone, but of course they were going to pick up on it, they would whoever had said it from any club. That's what the press do.

It deserves a mention in a match report. Not to be the main talking point from the game. Its just shit stirring the over reaction to this.


This this and this all day fucking long.
 
Re: Paper prick

moomba said:
Pigeonho said:
All agenda nonsense aside, what did you seriously think they would say in relation to that supposed gaff? If you thought the papers would ignore it then you are naive. It doesn't take anything away from the win for anyone, but of course they were going to pick up on it, they would whoever had said it from any club. That's what the press do.

It deserves a mention in a match report. Not to be the main talking point from the game. Its just shit stirring the over reaction to this.

Spot on. Would be but a footnote in a regular match report for anyone else - I've only been on two sites this morning and it's the lead football item on both.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.