I don't know why we signed him. Surely when you spend a significant amount on a youngster with the aim of sending him out on loan you are doing it for 1 of 2 reasons. 1. He gets experience and comes back into our 1st team or 2. To make a profit on a sale. What's the frigging point of sending him back on loan to the same club? I don't care what Roberts wanted, he should have been told the only way he was going back to Celtic was if they were buying him.
I would like to know what price we actually paid for him.
I am certain it is not anything remotely like 12m as stated, in fact I would say more like 2m down payment, the rest based on appearances/caps which will never be met.