Pedro

You rate him, I don't - this is going round in circles

The long and short of it is I don't think he'll make the difference in the PL. I suppose we'll see in the next 12 months if he's transferred


He'll be offered a new contract.
 
Waaay better than Navas.
The most two-footed player I know of. Beats a man, really good finisher, great work ethic. Not playing that much due to having Neymar, Iniesta and Messi ahead of him in the pecking order.
I don't think he is. Navas's finishing is poor, but I don't think there's much between them
 
He would be a Plan B signing but that doesn't mean he would be a bad one. There's a lot of pedigree in him and at his age, and likely cost, with possibly the arrival of Pep in a year's time, he could possibly be one of the first names on our team sheet and I'm sure our attacking options would be boosted.
 
Pedro Vs Sterling: who's the better player? Let's for a moment forget about age, injury record, fee required to get them. Judge based on abilities only please
*Genuine question*
 
Sterling is the better player already and he's only 20. I have always found Pedro to be very one dimensional and that is why he has only played a bit part for Barca and why it seems they are looking to ship him off. Would be very disappointed if we have to settle for Pedro.
 
Was an important cog in the best Barca side Europe has ever seen. Yes he's going to have a hard time getting in front of their current front 3 but that lad had the discipline and skill to play his role to perfection. He's who I hoped we would go for instead of Navas at the time, as I believed (And still do, if we were playing a front 3) that whoever is there needs to contribute goals as well as everything else.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.