People cheering when Bravo caught the ball

Status
Not open for further replies.
The thread has deteriorated to a new level, just like the verbal abuse. Comments by fans that Bravo should've saved this and that and was at fault for whatever are testimony to the power of the rag based media. They are rubbish assumptions and are prolonged by the Joe Hart fan club. Apart from the Derby mix up with stones Bravo has been at fault for nothing, however haters will always hate and see what they want to see. I expect it from rag filth but am embarrassed when so called City fans jeer their keeper and rant on antagonistic radio phone ins and tweet for repeat column inches in papers and social media to discredit our players and club. How can anyone who loves their team behave like that's? God knows there's enough filth out there to do it without our own so called fans. FFS support your team on the pitch and focus your abuse on the opposition, not our own. I must say I'm as saddened by some elements of our current support as I have ever been following City for close on 50 years.
 
The thread has deteriorated to a new level, just like the verbal abuse. Comments by fans that Bravo should've saved this and that and was at fault for whatever are testimony to the power of the rag based media. They are rubbish assumptions and are prolonged by the Joe Hart fan club. Apart from the Derby mix up with stones Bravo has been at fault for nothing, however haters will always hate and see what they want to see. I expect it from rag filth but am embarrassed when so called City fans jeer their keeper and rant on antagonistic radio phone ins and tweet for repeat column inches in papers and social media to discredit our players and club. How can anyone who loves their team behave like that's? God knows there's enough filth out there to do it without our own so called fans. FFS support your team on the pitch and focus your abuse on the opposition, not our own. I must say I'm as saddened by some elements of our current support as I have ever been following City for close on 50 years.

Abusing a player at the game is not my bag, neither is sarcastic cheering.

But to suggest Bravo has been at fault for nothing, and those who think he has have been hoodwinked by the media suggests you are paranoid about the press and clearly deluded.

He has been culpable, but not alone, for Williams goal and Leicesters second. To suggest he wasn't is just plain wrong
 
Abusing a player at the game is not my bag, neither is sarcastic cheering.

But to suggest Bravo has been at fault for nothing, and those who think he has have been hoodwinked by the media suggests you are paranoid about the press and clearly deluded.

He has been culpable, but not alone, for Williams goal and Leicesters second. To suggest he wasn't is just plain wrong

Well then plain wrong I must be. I was a keeper for 22 years at both junior and senior level and can say it's easy to cast assertions on a keeper for a goal without knowledge, understanding the roll or being privy to the pace, speed and bend of the ball. I have watched and re-watched every performance (yes I'm sad) and I can point to 2 incidents that he could be culpable, factor in language, a new, strange team, with shit defending, a new country and different type of football then through 18 games this potential error average is far better than most. Hart I liked as well but to think Joe was flawless and needs to come back is wrong, he had far more feck ups than Bravo and had a suspect left side. Regardless of the disagreement in performances the verbal abuse and venum aimed toward him is counterproductive to not only his confidence but to that of the entire team and in my eyes is totally anti City
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.