PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
You think we can't tell the difference between raz and clichy? in your tiny mind maybe
some people clearly don't or they wouldn't get mixed up would they?
you've turned into a right arse.
You think we can't tell the difference between raz and clichy? in your tiny mind maybe
She maybe GDM. The Harry Grout of B M.some people clearly don't or they wouldn't get mixed up would they?
you've turned into a right arse.
What was your last username?some people clearly don't or they wouldn't get mixed up would they?
you've turned into a right arse.
The thread has deteriorated to a new level, just like the verbal abuse. Comments by fans that Bravo should've saved this and that and was at fault for whatever are testimony to the power of the rag based media. They are rubbish assumptions and are prolonged by the Joe Hart fan club. Apart from the Derby mix up with stones Bravo has been at fault for nothing, however haters will always hate and see what they want to see. I expect it from rag filth but am embarrassed when so called City fans jeer their keeper and rant on antagonistic radio phone ins and tweet for repeat column inches in papers and social media to discredit our players and club. How can anyone who loves their team behave like that's? God knows there's enough filth out there to do it without our own so called fans. FFS support your team on the pitch and focus your abuse on the opposition, not our own. I must say I'm as saddened by some elements of our current support as I have ever been following City for close on 50 years.
Abusing a player at the game is not my bag, neither is sarcastic cheering.
But to suggest Bravo has been at fault for nothing, and those who think he has have been hoodwinked by the media suggests you are paranoid about the press and clearly deluded.
He has been culpable, but not alone, for Williams goal and Leicesters second. To suggest he wasn't is just plain wrong
Not placing any blame on anyone but...
This is your fucking fault boo boys.