sir baconface
Well-Known Member
Interesting.I agree with everything you said except Klopp part. But Klopp didn't have the best resources at Liverpool?!
I would also put in Mourinho's porto who won everything in 3rd criteria.
Yes, Mourinho’s success with Porto would certainly fit category 3. However, despite that plus his excellent achievements in terms of trophies, Pep‘s superiority on criterion 2 shades it for me. He’s been supremely “functional”.
Add to that, I can’t stand the moaning cnut!
I disagree with you on Klopp. He has thrived on much lower resources than Mourinho at Chelsea or Pep at any club (Including City). He didn’t inherit a Messi, Merlin, Kun or Vinny. His team building has been far more cost efficient, even allowing for the Coutinho financial miracle. Again though, his artistic merit factor is inferior to Pep’s. A brilliant manager though.
Horses for courses. All three are serious contenders in their own ways.