manimanc
Well-Known Member
He tried to kick him in the leg but missed.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
The DT this morning reports that he is not surprised that Pep hasn't been charged with going onto the pitch whilst the game still had seconds to run. Against Soton this season the PEG was sent to the stands for stepping on the pitch while play was going on. He accuses the FArce of double standards.
His memory, if he has a functioning one, won't want to recall that Mario, Sweep, and Adebayor were all in their time charged by the FA post match for 'indiscretions' and received match bans, as the rule book suggests they should. How does he explain the 'standard' that allows Lucky Luke to escape a similar punishment for a nigh-on identical transgression as those players mentioned. Surely it can't be double standards, or was a fortuitous moment where a Rag apparatchik was on the panel that deliberated?
His memory, if he has a functioning one, won't want to recall that Mario, Sweep, and Adebayor were all in their time charged by the FA post match for 'indiscretions' and received match bans, as the rule book suggests they should. How does he explain the 'standard' that allows Lucky Luke to escape a similar punishment for a nigh-on identical transgression as those players mentioned. Surely it can't be double standards, or was a fortuitous moment where a Rag apparatchik was on the panel that deliberated?
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
He tried to kick him in the leg but missed.
And wasn't Nathan rubbing his eye on the way down the tunnel after Pep had crept up behind and gouged his eyeball out?
Actually he just try to make some space by sending him 2 kicks.He tried to kick him in the leg but missed.
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
Once again, look at how these incidents are being dealt with & how Wenger doesn't get questioned for a slanderous accusation about one of our players, then all of you who are happy to have 3 faceless blokes in a van somewhere, deciding the outcome of our games by video, & Utd, Arsenal, Liverpool etc games, in the future, give your heads a wobble.
SebastianBlue
President, International Julian Alvarez Fan Club
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 57,736
The entire inquisition is a farce and is only being perpetuated by the United and Liverpool sychophants in the press. I watched the entire thing from my seat at the match (as did many on here, as mentioned previously) and everything about Redmond’s body language said he was taking in what Pep was saying and was not in anyway put off or looking to end the interaction.
If anything, he probably wished it had been the other way round and he was in a sky blue shirt getting a right bollucking from Pep about how he should have played better for us that match (you can tell in his written response to The Sun’s “lipreading” that he doesn’t want to burn any ornate bridges in this episode).
If anything, he probably wished it had been the other way round and he was in a sky blue shirt getting a right bollucking from Pep about how he should have played better for us that match (you can tell in his written response to The Sun’s “lipreading” that he doesn’t want to burn any ornate bridges in this episode).
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
Loved Pep before this.
Love him even more after it.
Mancini fucked off the GPC and Pep outdoes the PEG with nothing more than endearing charm. I remember my ERO saying when Pep arrived "What is there not to like about him"?
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
Frankly it would not surprise me to see a punishment.
There is no way he can be stopped from his normal job so whats the problem?. When the team is fired up they know exactly what to do and surely don´t need Pep during the game do they ?
If so modern technology has ways and means to negate such punishment.
Something and nothing whatever the decision.
There is no way he can be stopped from his normal job so whats the problem?. When the team is fired up they know exactly what to do and surely don´t need Pep during the game do they ?
If so modern technology has ways and means to negate such punishment.
Something and nothing whatever the decision.
Blue Til Death
Well-Known Member
I bet Pep doesn't give a flying fuck about some pricks investigating a non incident that will arrive at a non conclusion, the FA are beyond a laughing stock as are the media, if it was PEG they would be lauding him for passionately advising a young player as he walked off after a defeat..
maybe he should have kicked him
In the bollocks instead......
maybe he should have kicked him
In the bollocks instead......
Once again, look at how these incidents are being dealt with & how Wenger doesn't get questioned for a slanderous accusation about one of our players, then all of you who are happy to have 3 faceless blokes in a van somewhere, deciding the outcome of our games by video, & Utd, Arsenal, Liverpool etc games, in the future, give your heads a wobble.
Yep and tomorrow Sterling will win us a penalty and it be looked at and he be banned for 2 games