Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
His suits are shit so he’s obviously shit.
His suits are shit so he’s obviously shit.
Naglesmann is Tuchel light. Tuchel didn't have a great spell at Dortmund and PSG aren't that impressed with him either.
PSG aren't impressed by a man who guided them to their first ever CL final?
Have a week off mate ;)
I meant the supporters but the point still stands.
In that case have a month off.
Still scraped through the quarter finals.
Only cos they didn't have a colossus like Rodri running the show ;)
Quite the list of esteemed company there, however the phrase ect ect ect, is it an abbreviation of the lancashire/latin phrase eck t,cetera, meaning other similar things, and not the usual etc?no, we dont have knobheads fishing, except for ,@snorky ,@BlueMoonRisin' ,@idahoblues ,@Saddleworth2 ,@Newman Noggs ,@Didsbury Dave ,@Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese ect ect ect
Get what your saying but it’s not a minor rebuild is it . 2 centre half’s 1 first choice left back . New centre forward to slot in when kun Retires . Maybe a defensive midfielder if Rodri Is deemed not good enough . We have more problems than a lot of people want to admit . Feel sorry for Rodri because while pep picks gundogun it will make Rodri look weakGreat news.
I’m sure like me, many were infuriated with Pep’s line up and tactics against Lyon but he’s still one of the best managers in the history of the game.
Minor rebuild required, lets take back the PREMIER LEAGUE because that’s what we watch week in, week out.
We’ve already done great business this transfer window. Let’s bring in a commanding CB, hopefully Koulibaly, add some energy to our midfield, possibly get a LB in, the attack will sort it’s self out and storm the league.
I don’t think Poch is better than Pep. There is no better manager in the world than Pep for what City want to achieve. I’ve been clear on other threads that the ideal scenario for City is signing Pep up to a new long-term contract.
The point I was making is that for a club with huge financial resources and top class players, Pep is the perfect coach. However, I don’t think Pep would have the same impact managing a side with average/good players and a low transfer budget.
My argument is simply that when Pep leaves, Poch should certainly be on the list of possible replacements
Because it was between spurs and leicester,you cant say leicester had the better players,how many years is it said that they are in the title race just to fall away,the rest of us were out of itWe also lost the league to Leicester. As did Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal and United. Why are Spurs the only side criticised for that?
We had a team consisting of Aguero, KDB, Sterling, Kompany etc as well.
How were the Dippers there for the taking exactly? They went 1-0 up early doors to a ridiculously harsh penalty and were up against it ever since. Liverpool were and remain a class above Spurs.
I actually find the idea that Pep couldn't successfully manage a lower level team successfully quite laughable. I'm quite sure that a manager of Pep's knowledge, ability and intelligence could adapt to that if he wanted to. But why the fuck would he ever want to!?
He's the perfect coach for teams with lots of money and top players because he operates on a level that few coaches do, which is exactly why he could apply himself to managing any team he chose.
Our fullbacks were all over thirty,sagna was 33,they would have been replaced at any top club tbfI’m not saying that he couldn’t manage at a lower level, he was successful with the Barca B side.
I just don’t think that he could walk into Spurs or Arsenal, operate within their budgets and enjoy the same level of success he’s had at Barca, Bayern and City.
At City he bought Bravo for £18 million, that didn’t work out so he bought Ederson for £30+ million. He inherited a weakness at full back and was given nearly £120 million on three full backs.
At Arsenal or Spurs he’d have to persist with the players he bought and look for cheaper alternatives to the finished article.
In his first season at City he knew that his players could not play his system. Instead of adapting to them, he insisted on his way and replaced those ill suited to his style. Long-term that paid off but he would not have that luxury at the majority of clubs.
What I’m saying about Pep applies to every manager by the way. Money and talent is the key to winning trophies. At the very top level, Pep does it better than any other. But I don’t think Pep would fare much better than the likes of Pochettino when managing a club in the tier below the elite.
Our fullbacks were all over thirty,sagna was 33,they would have been replaced at any top club tbf
Hmm. Still managed to make a complete mess of the line up v Lyon.I actually find the idea that Pep couldn't successfully manage a lower level team successfully quite laughable. I'm quite sure that a manager of Pep's knowledge, ability and intelligence could adapt to that if he wanted to. But why the fuck would he ever want to!?
He's the perfect coach for teams with lots of money and top players because he operates on a level that few coaches do, which is exactly why he could apply himself to managing any team he chose.
No and they should have been 3-0 down in 15 minutes, but Lyon decided to be as wasteful as City often are.Did Bayern protect their fragile defence (Boateng) tonight?
Who has won precisely what?Needs to go. Pochetino IN