According to the stats, Ben Arfa is better than Boufal.
I don't get the point of this claim. Is it that in fact Arfa is a useless player? Or that Arfa isn't good enough for us? Or that Boufal is better than Arfa yet the Stats say otherwise? Or that stats don't tell you everything?
Anyway I will assume it's all of the above.
1. You can dig up the old Arfa thread, to see how many wanted him here.
2. Arfa is Mahrez before Mahrez. Often unplayable even in the Prem. So I'm not surprised he is doing well.
3. I don't think Boufal is better than Arfa. But the 22 year old pulling Mahrez and Arfa like stunts does intrigue me. Especially giving such raw talent to Pep makes me giddy.
But assuming some even think Boufal was better, yet the Stats suggests otherwise. The fact they are Statistically close would support 2 people reaching opposite conclusion on who's better.
And finally, I'd this was to somehow try to absolve Rony, then its a silly claim. Boufal and Rony were not Statistically close. Rony was inferior in almost every category. So the likelihood that disparate conclusions would be reached are highly unlikely.
Hence why I agreed with g180, that while facts and stats dont show everything, they are highly indicative when the disparity is across the board. Especially when it comes to players playing in similar positions for the same team.