Peter Crouch Eye Gouge

[blink922]

"It is the correct decision,'' Coates told The Sentinel. "Peter is a good character who plays the game in the right way. People within the game know that.''

He added: "Nobody involved made a fuss about it and that's always a good sign.''

You can't make this shit up.

 

[dom]

"It is the correct decision,'' Coates told The Sentinel. "Peter is a good character who plays the game in the right way. People within the game know that.''

He added: "Nobody involved made a fuss about it and that's always a good sign.''

You can't make this shit up.

And this pathetic Coates cringer's 'rationalisations' simply beg the original question again,

we all saw what Peter Crouch did... the TV commentary over the clip I saw went... "How is Crouch going to explain this one away ??"

Answer.... quite easily with the help of a corrupt FA....!!

 

[Heart.net]

"It is the correct decision,'' Coates told The Sentinel. "Peter is a good character who plays the game in the right way. People within the game know that.''

He added: "Nobody involved made a fuss about it and that's always a good sign.''

You can't make this shit up.

Wtf? Just because he has a good character doesn't change the fact he tried to eye gouge someone with malicious intent.

The rules are rules, i don't understand why it applies to one person but not to the other. Referee's and the FA need to respect the laws of the game by upholding it instead of making it look an absolute joke by picking and choosing.

Only then can players and managers respect the refs and FA. No one is above the law but unfortunately that's not the case.

 

[u2fme2]

No charge according to SSN

Fucking disgusting act and one of the most horrible things you could even attempt to get away with on a sports pitch.

even in rugby your looking at a long ban