crazyg
Well-Known Member
It wasn't very (a)cute.Obtuse?
It wasn't very (a)cute.Obtuse?
AcuteObtuse?
While that is no doubt true, it would take away the plain bent Refs we now have, who favour two teams who will remain nameless...Good points,
The system is producing referees that are not up to standard.
Are the EFL refs any better?
Some of us believed VAR would make things transparent, but thats become even more corrupt than the ref and two assistantsWhile that is no doubt true, it would take away the plain bent Refs we now have, who favour two teams who will remain nameless...
Tony Harrington is very good. We shall see if the PL's "interpretations" ruin him. Only problem is him being a Boro fan.Four new referees for 2021/22 Premier League
PGMOL confirms new officials have been promoted to Select Group 1 ahead of the new seasonwww.premierleague.com
Next set of bent cunts announced. I hope the Aussie isn't.
While that is no doubt true, it would take away the plain bent Refs we now have, who favour two teams who will remain nameless...
Institutional biasWhen you say "bent", who do you accuse?
Is it the refs taking bribes, the institution taking bribes?
What exactly is it you know, believe or think is happening?
It is not just the winning of trophies, it is being there or thereabouts and the publicity that goes with it. We all know, perhaps through a blue tint, that without penalties they both would have been miles behind.So are you saying the premier league executives tell referees that they have to show bias or cheat, to get a job,
All the refs , at a general meeting, just the one or two ?
What I am trying to get at , is how it operates this bent system ?
What are your thoughts , because that quote, really doesn't work for me. Rags have won fuck all for a while and if the bent refs have failed so miserably, they wouldn't be paid their bung