It might be as simple as unconscious bias. We know that we are on a loser when head lines are being formulated.
Remember when Scudamore said a poor rags team was bad for the PL brand..
Basically he was saying it would affect the 'value' of the 'brand' when it came to selling the 'product' world wide..
Maybe money stuffed in brown envelopes is not physically happening but in a round about way it is..
Favouring the rags (and dippers), keeping them relevant by awarding one an unhealthy amount of penalties and the other a huge leg up to win the league for the first time in a generation has gone a long way to maintain the 'value' of the 'product'.
PL referees, VAR officials, match commentators and co-commentators, not to mention SKY and BT and the written media all stand to be well serviced from the tonnes of money sloshing about in the PL trough..
After Scudamore's comments, one could not help but think it's bound to influence match officials and subsequent, rag and dipper cheerleaders when calls are close on the pitch..
Maybe it's me being harsh on our rivals, maybe all the penalty calls, forearm smashing defenders, forcing opposition players into the advertising hordings and then staying on the pitch, manager's running on the pitch after a goal and receiving no punishment when, say the Wolves manager for example did exactly the same and was given a touchline ban and fine..
Maybe the playing field is in fact completely level, VAR is favouring no particular team, ref's are not swayed by red shirted teams and the media and sports stations give fair and unbiased opinion on all the PL teams..
Maybe I'm seeing something that's just not there..
Maybe it's not bent as fcuk after all..
Anyway, I've renewed my season card so I can vent how I feel when I get back in the stadium..!