squirtyflower
Well-Known Member
seems like the PFA are the defence counsel and the judge
justice in action
justice in action
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PFA Back Tevez
- Thread starter Manchester_City_Blue
- Start date
portisheadblue
Well-Known Member
I think most folk regard Taylor as a smug self serving overpaid bar steward with a massive conflict of interest in this case and a person not fit to be a company director (current court case refers)
That said, maybe City should have fined Tevez one weeks wages for each of the five charges he was found guilty of!
Grrrrrh Bah as desperate Dan would have said!
That said, maybe City should have fined Tevez one weeks wages for each of the five charges he was found guilty of!
Grrrrrh Bah as desperate Dan would have said!
portisheadblue
Well-Known Member
Just read the City OS response ... Basically they call Gordon Taylor a two faced lying pile of dog shit .... And reading between the lines he might be next in line for some treatment.
This whole PFA having final say is iniquitous ... Wonder if it could be challenged in court?
This whole PFA having final say is iniquitous ... Wonder if it could be challenged in court?
The Future's Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 3,302
We're gonna slap Graham Taylor, slap Graham Taylor,
We're gonna slap Graham Taylor..............................
Sung loud, and clear!
We're gonna slap Graham Taylor..............................
Sung loud, and clear!
silverback
Well-Known Member
Do I not like that!!The Future's Blue said:We're gonna slap Graham Taylor, slap Graham Taylor,
We're gonna slap Graham Taylor..............................
Sung loud, and clear!
bumbleblue
Well-Known Member
The Future's Blue said:We're gonna slap Graham Taylor, slap Graham Taylor,
We're gonna slap Graham Taylor..............................
Sung loud, and clear!
And so we should the odeous shit bag
laserblue
Well-Known Member
here's city's official response to the pfa statement.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Club-news/2011/October/Carlos-Tevez-Latest-update" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Club-news/20 ... est-update</a>
Manchester City Football Club has received notification from the Players' Union (PFA) that it will not support a four-week fine as a penalty for the actions of misconduct of Carlos Tevez.
The Club acknowledges that the Players' Union is the sole organisation empowered with granting the ability for clubs to levy fines greater than the two weeks provided for in player contracts.
However, Manchester City is disappointed by the apparent PFA conflict of interest evident in this process.
Carlos Tevez has been personally represented throughout by the PFA Chief Executive, on whose considerations the Club has been informed that the PFA has made its decision.
Manchester City has been in constant dialogue with the PFA since September 28th. Today's PFA decision is a departure from the Club's understanding of that dialogue.
Without recourse to the PFA decision available, the maximum two-week fine provided for in standard player contracts will now be applied in relation to the misconduct of Carlos Tevez.
conflict of interest? represented throughout by the pfa chief executive? departure from the club's understanding of the dialogue? tevez's fine has been reduced to 2 weeks but it sounds like taylor has been playing the shyster lawyer.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Club-news/2011/October/Carlos-Tevez-Latest-update" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Club-news/20 ... est-update</a>
Manchester City Football Club has received notification from the Players' Union (PFA) that it will not support a four-week fine as a penalty for the actions of misconduct of Carlos Tevez.
The Club acknowledges that the Players' Union is the sole organisation empowered with granting the ability for clubs to levy fines greater than the two weeks provided for in player contracts.
However, Manchester City is disappointed by the apparent PFA conflict of interest evident in this process.
Carlos Tevez has been personally represented throughout by the PFA Chief Executive, on whose considerations the Club has been informed that the PFA has made its decision.
Manchester City has been in constant dialogue with the PFA since September 28th. Today's PFA decision is a departure from the Club's understanding of that dialogue.
Without recourse to the PFA decision available, the maximum two-week fine provided for in standard player contracts will now be applied in relation to the misconduct of Carlos Tevez.
conflict of interest? represented throughout by the pfa chief executive? departure from the club's understanding of the dialogue? tevez's fine has been reduced to 2 weeks but it sounds like taylor has been playing the shyster lawyer.
i8rags
Well-Known Member
What are we saying then.
LittleStan
Well-Known Member
Just listened to the video and it looks like the fine is for the Munich farce only hence the limit of 2 weeks. All the other breaches of contract don't seem to come into the fine but are now down on record.
No problems with this, I expected some comeback.
No problems with this, I expected some comeback.
laserblue
Well-Known Member
i8rags said:What are we saying then.
that the club has had to cave in to taylor's demands on behalf of tevez & scrap the club imposed 4 weeks fine in favour of the pfa 'approved' fine of 2 weeks.