Pic of Richards on the OS

Graceyboy said:
So are we saying that any blue with any tenuous link to utd is a capital punishment offense?


No - but thanks for joining in - you'll find youself quite at home here.
Have you had your 5 a day?
Do you listen to 5 live?
Did you like the band 5?
Does a Robin red breast visit your garden?
 
SWP's back said:
The Fat el Hombre said:
SWP's back said:
It is a black cap with a black No.5 on it fella.

It doesn't say MUFC on it, nor has it any affiliation with MUFC.

Complete non-story and non-thread.

Except it does.
Where? I can' fucking see it. Point me to where it says MUFC on it.

Unfortunately for us all life isn't quite that simple. If Micah had a number 69 on his cap on the front page of the OS some might also object. Does it need a picture of the sexual position for it to be considered crude and for us to know what it's about? Of course not. Just as it doesn't need MUFC on it for anyone to know that the number 5 on ferdinands clothing range represents his squad number for the past decade or so for man united. That's a close enough connection for me.

It's similar to the symbol CR7. Now, some people might say '2 letters and a number, whats the problem bluemooners will whinge about anything blah blah', but I wouldn't expect to see a City player on the OS with CR7 clobber on, for (seemingly, to me) obvious reasons. I see little or no difference between this and ferdinands clobber with his squad number on it and I don't think it should be on the MCFC OS

Am I angry about it? No. Do I think Micah is a rag or a rag lover? No. Will my opinion of him change in any way? No. Do I think it should be on the front page of the OS? No

A curious question for those who think it should be on the OS - fashion preferences aside, would you wear a rio ferdinand hat that has rio ferdinands man united squad number to a City game?
 
The Fat el Hombre said:
SWP's back said:
The Fat el Hombre said:
Except it does.
Where? I can' fucking see it. Point me to where it says MUFC on it.

Unfortunately for us all life isn't quite that simple. If Micah had a number 69 on his cap on the front page of the OS some might also object. Does it need a picture of the sexual position for it to be considered crude and for us to know what it's about? Of course not. Just as it doesn't need MUFC on it for anyone to know that the number 5 on ferdinands clothing range represents his squad number for the past decade or so for man united. That's a close enough connection for me.

It's similar to the symbol CR7. Now, some people might say '2 letters and a number, whats the problem bluemooners will whinge about anything blah blah', but I wouldn't expect to see a City player on the OS with CR7 clobber on, for (seemingly, to me) obvious reasons. I see little or no difference between this and ferdinands clobber with his squad number on it and I don't think it should be on the MCFC OS

Am I angry about it? No. Do I think Micah is a rag or a rag lover? No. Will my opinion of him change in any way? No. Do I think it should be on the front page of the OS? No

A curious question for those who think it should be on the OS - fashion preferences aside, would you wear a rio ferdinand hat that has rio ferdinands man united squad number to a City game?
No one is saying it should be on the OS, people are saying a person has a right to wear what he wants, and if that's part of Ferdinand's clothing range because that particular person likes the style of it, who is anyone on here to question him? It's just an item of clothing, nothing more, nothing less.
 
In this commercial world to wear a cap with a logo during a worldwide sporting interview or any other sporting event is usually for promotion and advertising purposes.
Only Micah and rio know the reason he wore it and I doubt they are planning to sell them in the City store!!
 
Shirley said:
In this commercial world to wear a cap with a logo during a worldwide sporting interview or any other sporting event is usually for promotion and advertising purposes.
Only Micah and rio know the reason he wore it and I doubt they are planning to sell them in the City store!!
I'm gonna hazard a guess at that right now:
Micah likes it
 
Pigeonho said:
Shirley said:
In this commercial world to wear a cap with a logo during a worldwide sporting interview or any other sporting event is usually for promotion and advertising purposes.
Only Micah and rio know the reason he wore it and I doubt they are planning to sell them in the City store!!
I'm gonna hazard a guess at that right now:
Micah likes it

Are you a teenage girl?
 
Pigeonho said:
The Fat el Hombre said:
SWP's back said:
Where? I can' fucking see it. Point me to where it says MUFC on it.

Unfortunately for us all life isn't quite that simple. If Micah had a number 69 on his cap on the front page of the OS some might also object. Does it need a picture of the sexual position for it to be considered crude and for us to know what it's about? Of course not. Just as it doesn't need MUFC on it for anyone to know that the number 5 on ferdinands clothing range represents his squad number for the past decade or so for man united. That's a close enough connection for me.

It's similar to the symbol CR7. Now, some people might say '2 letters and a number, whats the problem bluemooners will whinge about anything blah blah', but I wouldn't expect to see a City player on the OS with CR7 clobber on, for (seemingly, to me) obvious reasons. I see little or no difference between this and ferdinands clobber with his squad number on it and I don't think it should be on the MCFC OS

Am I angry about it? No. Do I think Micah is a rag or a rag lover? No. Will my opinion of him change in any way? No. Do I think it should be on the front page of the OS? No

A curious question for those who think it should be on the OS - fashion preferences aside, would you wear a rio ferdinand hat that has rio ferdinands man united squad number to a City game?
No one is saying it should be on the OS, people are saying a person has a right to wear what he wants, and if that's part of Ferdinand's clothing range because that particular person likes the style of it, who is anyone on here to question him? It's just an item of clothing, nothing more, nothing less.

Except it isn't, for reasons that's I've just explained. There are connotations behind the number 5 in this instance (as I've explained). If it was a random number like 81 then you might have a point, but it isn't so you don't

"No one is saying it should be on the OS". Eh? That's where it is - that's what the thread is about. The thread title "Pic of Richards on OS" is a bit of a giveaway...

Would you wear the cap to a City game (fashion sense aside)?
 
The Fat el Hombre said:
SWP's back said:
The Fat el Hombre said:
Except it does.
Where? I can' fucking see it. Point me to where it says MUFC on it.

Unfortunately for us all life isn't quite that simple. If Micah had a number 69 on his cap on the front page of the OS some might also object. Does it need a picture of the sexual position for it to be considered crude and for us to know what it's about? Of course not. Just as it doesn't need MUFC on it for anyone to know that the number 5 on ferdinands clothing range represents his squad number for the past decade or so for man united. That's a close enough connection for me.

It's similar to the symbol CR7. Now, some people might say '2 letters and a number, whats the problem bluemooners will whinge about anything blah blah', but I wouldn't expect to see a City player on the OS with CR7 clobber on, for (seemingly, to me) obvious reasons. I see little or no difference between this and ferdinands clobber with his squad number on it and I don't think it should be on the MCFC OS

Am I angry about it? No. Do I think Micah is a rag or a rag lover? No. Will my opinion of him change in any way? No. Do I think it should be on the front page of the OS? No

A curious question for those who think it should be on the OS - fashion preferences aside, would you wear a rio ferdinand hat that has rio ferdinands man united squad number to a City game?


a) I still reiterate he is wearing Zaba's cap because it has the number 5 on it.

b) who the heck is wio/rio and why is the number 5 significant to him? (If he plays for the quiet neighbours I never take notice of their numbers and actually there are only 2 of their players whose names I remember, Rooney & Giggs..... does that say something about me that the only 2 I know are the ones who cheated on their wives allegedly)!!!

c) you say I wouldn't expect etc., etc., for "(seemingly, to me) obvious reasons" well they may be obvious to you but I have no idea in the wide world what you are going on about!! What in heaven's name is CR7????

d) In the overall scheme of things.................... does it matter?? It's out there now on the OS, we on Bluemoon can't do anything about it, so let's move on to more important things like....................... is it a barmcake or a muffin.............. is the sun going to shine tomorrow.................... are we going to be invaded by aliens tomorrow.............. well actually that last one has already happened and quite a few of them seem to have taken over Bluemoon!! ;-)

RIC, RIC, RIC, where's the alien detector kept these days? Is it in the cupboard with the caps with a number 5 on it??? Please point me in the right direction. :-)









sorry couldn't resist all that because this thread has me in stitches............... maybe I should design a new hat? But that hat is ZABA's
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.