As I said it clearly IS relevant. Let me give you 2 scenarios (1) we have a transfer budget of £150M say, and can spend 65M on player (a) and 15M on player (b), meaning an extremely 50M available for player (c) in another position (2) a player costs 65M and is amortised over 5 years and a new manager wants to sell him after a year but can only sell for 20M, then the accounts take a hit of 32M on the sale. You SERIOUSLY do not think these factors are relevant to the supporters of that club?As I said it is irrelevant to us as fans it is relevant only to the club
Glad to see that you agree
As I said it clearly IS relevant. Let me give you 2 scenarios (1) we have a transfer budget of £150M say, and can spend 65M on player (a) and 15M on player (b), meaning an extremely 50M available for player (c) in another position (2) a player costs 65M and is amortised over 5 years and a new manager wants to sell him after a year but can only sell for 20M, then the accounts take a hit of 32M on the sale. You SERIOUSLY do not think these factors are relevant to the supporters of that club?
I can only surmise from you repeating the same sentiment that you receive as much pocket money that you ask for?It means absolutely nothing to us as fans. It clearly might upset the club owner and the accountants but they would have sanctioned the sale therefore must be happy with it
The club transfer policy gives fans of clubs the chance to scream "what a waste of money" at each other that is it
What relavence do the finances of this club have to us as supporters.
![]()
Not very assuring this :/
Good.
If we are going to spend this sort of money, we should spend it on a player who is not going to be off to the ACN mid season.
Wouldn't sign any other big money player who would be either.
Other teams lose out on players too. He's ONLY a player, and we have to set boundaries / budgets.
If there's a car you really like and the salesman is asking way too much money, do you still buy it even though it's massively overpriced? it's very rare that someone would do that.
Otherwise, where's the end to it all? how much will the next reserve goalkeeper cost? 100m - just because we 'need' one? We must be seen to walk away from deals.
Regarding price - I'm a big believer that if we value him at 60, then pay the 65. Similarly with Sterling, we'd identified what we needed and it not worth falling through for the sake of a few mil
That said, if valuations are miles off then walk away. He's not the only quick player who knows where the net is, I haven't got any suggestions but I'm sure out scouting network can find someone
It's also true. It makes no difference to you and the guys making the decision have a better handle on what they can afford that you or I would.Won't be long before some cretin uses the non-argument "it's not your money so what are you worried about"
Very popular that one. Still it's something to say that lots of posters will agree with ;)
You have the same philosophy in regards to spending as my wife...
Which is why lay people moaning about the price is irrelevant as they don't have the income and expense breakdowns to hand and therefore cannot know what is too expensive.Of course the price has a relevance, it is called FFP, and as much as all the kfa's said ffp wouldn't ever bite our arse, well it has
Banucci?We should have extra money to spend due to the laporte deal not happening.....i havent heard anything of a back up plan to him and stones was always a target as well so i wonder if the money that was ear marked for laporte will be spent elsewhere??????
Anyone know how it eorks in the ridiculous world of football money...it obviously cannt be as simple as that
knowing Everton they will take the failed Laporte deal into account when calculating any selling fee for Stones. Expect the fee to be about double we were hoping for?We should have extra money to spend due to the laporte deal not happening.....i havent heard anything of a back up plan to him and stones was always a target as well so i wonder if the money that was ear marked for laporte will be spent elsewhere??????
Anyone know how it eorks in the ridiculous world of football money...it obviously cannt be as simple as that
Banucci?
Apologies if I spelt it wrong. The only thing I know about him is that he is meant to be hard as fuck and punched an armed robber in the face and then chased him.Ok...not seen that link.....cheers
Who was also at the ACN. How about we sign Europeans and South Americans. I hear one or two of them can have their moments.I agree, instead we should sign players for 30 mil like bony aye?
Won't be long before some cretin uses the non-argument "it's not your money so what are you worried about"
Very popular that one. Still it's something to say that lots of posters will agree with ;)
This, exactly. If this was any other window It would've been fine to shell out huge amounts on 1 or 2 top class players. But the fact that we have a major rebuilding to do, this doesn't seem like a right step forward.I don't believe that is a cretinous point of view but but it is a limited one. However, what the club decides to pay for one individual player is not worth stressing over. What is important is to use to use the available budget to make the overall changes that the club needs in a window. The club needs to get the payback from its investment in players that its owner(s) want and I for one am happy to let Mansour and his Chinese friends worry about that. All the signs are that City have walked away from Pogba because the deal is too rich and they will do that for Auba if they see a deal from him that way.