PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

It seems to me that there is an inconsistency in the Premier League’s action. If the tribunal is to be held in private and the evidence not revealed publically should not the charges be treated similarly until the tribunal has completed its deliberations and reached its conclusions? To do otherwise seems to be effectively defamation by innuendo. If ever the government needed evidence that there needs to be an independent regulator for football then they should have it now.
 
Dribble said:
Awwww thank you! :-)

To be honest mate, I'm just sick & tired of my team being attacked. I'll defend City to the death, the same as I'd defend my kids.

I've had YEARS of practice of defending City from the 3rd division to the dreary Pearce years, so this is fuck all in comparison.

It's times like this that ALL City fans need to stand up & be counted. Make no mistake, we're at WAR & fighting for our very existence.

Fuck em! It's gloves off, bovver boots on & we tear into the scrap...
Click to expand...
Exactly!...

EMBRACE THE HATRED!
 
Colin Bell (genuine name) said:
Khaldoon‘s quote was this “Always look at facts. And I think people with glass homes shouldn’t be throwing rocks. I’m happy to talk to anyone as long as the conversation is about facts but once we start talking about innuendo and talking about theories I have no time for that.”
Click to expand...

I hadn't connected the fact that he used the word innuendo about the accusations 2 full years before the CAS panel used it to describe some of UEFA's accusations.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.