malg
Well-Known Member
Any of the gambling sites giving odds on a banner flying behind a plane tomorrow?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
He’s check mated you there, mate ;-)Pmsl
P—c5.Not at all, it was reaffirming what many had already said, it was a great speech under intense pressure under the scrutiny of the whole football world. Any Blue who was unmoved by that or wasn't impressed should consider watching chess.
And the crowd go wild, what a great move.
she’s a disgrace. formally of the Anfield Wrap she should be no where near reporting on any story relating to us.
Unfortunately for us she is perfect for Sky Sports' narrative
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Youse don't get this kind of service on rawk you know.And in English? Never thought I’d obtain a better command of English on Bluemoon;-)
1961_vintage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 15,330
Why couldn't these charges have been served privately and City given the opportunity to respond, for them to be investigated, heard and findings/conclusions made at which point then they go public?
Big Swifty
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Nov 2011
- Messages
- 4,361
Free REIN, please (no rein or check on them)Rik re your last paragraph ,I think the problem will be ,what players will want to sign for City with these charges hanging over them, I believe this is what the enemy are hoping for, we won't be able to sign players such as Bellingham etc therefore falling behind the likes of the dippers and rags who will have free reign.
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 17,593
- Team supported
- Manchester City
she’s a disgrace. formally of the Anfield Wrap she should be no where near reporting on any story relating to us.
Seriously is the standard so bad now that she is head of something and not just a minion reporter ?
Because the court ordered them to be published. Tbf, the PL wanted them kept out of the press.Why couldn't these charges have been served privately and City given the opportunity to respond, for them to be investigated, heard and findings/conclusions made at which point then they go public?
(am I right here or misremembering?)