I think they will be fine under FFP as they can always sell a couple of players to offset their losses
Swiss Ramble did a great breakdown explaining what it might look like for them
their cash flow is another matter though , although FFP doesn’t look at the cash flow statement ….
I think they may need to finish top 4 ,or they could be another Leeds
His piece on “it’s not FFP, it’s fraud” underscored his utter lack of understanding of accounting and finance. I hope all this shit IS about fraud because I can’t for the life of me understand how a panel of non-experts are possibly going to investigate, prove, test, gather evidence and conclude City committed true reporting fraud — for years — under the nose of their auditors. What’s Miggy going to say then?Surely Miggy Delooney is the man.
“It was a very bad day for football” Klopp.Remember the morning when we won at CAS? The sly sports studio was like a funeral, it was a mixture of shock and disappointment that we had won.
Swales ruined us , and since he did we lost our way as a genuine big club , it’s something these young kids have no idea about when they call us an “oil” club, we had bigger average attendances than all of the London clubs back then , I think all older football fans know it - sadly , any fan under 40 out there actually don’t know how big a club we were. We’ve been tarnished ever since Swales fucked off. Hey Ho , back to FFP talk !77 was a very good team, put together by Tony Book. Guess what Swales did next.
A disconnect that’s gone down very badly , sounds like they worried to me !
They flirted with it in 1985/6 (iirc) under Pleat when Clive Allen scored 49 (again, iirc).Runners up by 1 point in 77.
Finished 4th in 72 behind winners Derby by 1 point, same number of points as Leeds and Victimpool.
I can't recall Spurs putting in a serious and sustained challenge for the league in my lifetime, they were there abouts under Pochettino but fell away when it came down to the business end of the season.
“It was a very bad day for football” Klopp.
Leeds were borrowing against future earnings that weren't guaranteed.Ta, not seen anything from Swiss Ramble for a while now, but he's very good. He was my first entry into football finance, before PB!
I was thinking that the CL money was probably important, more than the transfers - as you say, they can _probably_ find someone to sell, and it's all positive income. I don't think they'll be a Leeds though, as they won't run out of money completely.
I asked the same question and I'm still none the wiser :(I don't get this one, is it worded properly?
He’s just a bitter over toothed prick because Pep is better on the pitch.“It was a very bad day for football” Klopp.