chesterbells
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 22,911
That’s why journalists like delaney need pulling upWe've been charged with not adhering to PL rules.
The PL can't accuse anyone of fraud.
That’s why journalists like delaney need pulling upWe've been charged with not adhering to PL rules.
The PL can't accuse anyone of fraud.
But they are not alleging just that we broke FFP or did not cooperate remember loosing too much money would also be a breach of FFP. They’re not even alleging that we miss represented the accounts in some FFP way not sure what that would be maybe allowances. I don’t know how FFP works do they look at the accounts or specially accounts prepared for FFP.
They are alleging that we paid people off the books ( that’s a tax / fraud implications) they are alleging that we increased revenue in a dishonest way again that would have tax implications probably for benefit of the tax man but negative ones for other investors.
Remember spurs sponsor getting done for inflating revenue ? Just before it got bought out for far more than it was worth
Most of the short term loans have been repaid to Mansour. They tided us over the low cash flow summer.
It's a possible implication, depending on the amounts, the frequency and how that relates to acceptable accounting standards, but it's possible to have broken the PL rules (e.g. by misrepresentation to them), but not have broken UK law (fraud).
What it is is an easy tag to use for the hard of thinking.
Neville’s a poisonous little snidey ****. His ranting about the penalty was a joke.Watching the game on TV & all I can see is Revenue flashing flashing all around the pitch, all around the middle tier. Someone give Neville a nudge & tell him that’s why we’re massive, look at the companies, look at the deals before you comment you ****!
& tell the **** it’s clear he turned up with a narrative that Cancelo missing will affect us. He keeps looking for a fault on Bernardo & he’s running the show.
That’s why journalists like delaney need pulling up
I take issue with this, especially the last sentence. Indeed, I resent being labelled by implication as hard of thinking. My reasons are stated in this 1,700-word post from yesterday: https://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/threads/media-thread-2022-23.355624/page-1628#post-15718654
No.Would previous titles really, I mean really be stripped? That would be difficult to take.
The rest is unfortunate and can be turned around quick but that's just wrong.