toutmaster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 453
Yes mate someone else confirmed that to.Google PWC, Deloitte & KPMG I guarantee you'll find plenty more than that.
Nothing to see.
Yes mate someone else confirmed that to.Google PWC, Deloitte & KPMG I guarantee you'll find plenty more than that.
Nothing to see.
I think innocent of charges apart fromWhy should we accept a fine mate , come on seriously? The cheat slur will never go away ? It’s not about being sensitive as a fan , the club (?) and most definitely Pep, and us , the life blood of this club don’t deserve it , so what you’re basically saying is we are only 90% innocent ? Not good enough I’m afraid , Pep , the best manager on the planet will be labelled , you know it and so does every City fan know it.
sorry but what does the above actually proveSo when you talked about ‘disguising it all’ that was just your view and not a confirmed or factual statement?
That’s a fair comment.Steady on chief. PB knows and seems to like explaining this stuff. If he has done a post then great. If not no probs.
In the UK, King's Counsel (KC) (previously Queen's Counsel (QC) from February 1952 until September 2022) refers to a set of barristers and solicitors who the monarch appoints to be a part of His Majesty's Counsel learned in the law.KC if you are male...QC if you are female...it's easy enough mate.
And take a CL spot every season.Win trophies.
this was already proved in CAS not to be an attempt to disguise payments so why is it being brought back up?In one of the emails, Simon Pearce writes to Jonathan Rowland promising that ADUG will fund Fordham with £11m per year.
Is that a fact though?this was already proved in CAS not to be an attempt to disguise payments so why is it being brought back up?
this was already proved in CAS not to be an attempt to disguise payments so why is it being brought back up?