abu13
Well-Known Member
The big difference is that Everton have clearly fallen foul of FFP regulations and i believe it is fully documented in their accounts, as such there is little to debate. However we are on completely different charges that if proven may then lead to FFP infringements.
My concern throughout all of this is the number of charges and the way they have been reported, in reality it is 6 charges over a number of years, their is a reason they released them the way they did, it is all about reputational damage. You have to wonder if this has had any impact on potential sponsership and investment.
My worry is that we were found guilty by UEFA and everyone jumped on the bandwagon and slated us, on appeal we saw just how fucked up and flimsey the evidence was against us. but we were still heavily tarnished. In the case of these charges as I understand it we don't have the immediate right of appeal to an organisation such as CAS.
My concern throughout all of this is the number of charges and the way they have been reported, in reality it is 6 charges over a number of years, their is a reason they released them the way they did, it is all about reputational damage. You have to wonder if this has had any impact on potential sponsership and investment.
My worry is that we were found guilty by UEFA and everyone jumped on the bandwagon and slated us, on appeal we saw just how fucked up and flimsey the evidence was against us. but we were still heavily tarnished. In the case of these charges as I understand it we don't have the immediate right of appeal to an organisation such as CAS.