Worsleyweb
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2022
- Messages
- 1,381
- Team supported
- City
That's my "I've just had my energy bill so the fucking heating isn't going on" top.
Looking well my friend and spoke very clearly and well on the subject.
That's my "I've just had my energy bill so the fucking heating isn't going on" top.
Thanks for the explanation and for the numerous post pertaining to the matter.That would have been the argument used by our lawyers. The PL can't go looking for a case to pursue. They have to have one when they ask for documents, emails, etc.
I could be wrong but it looks increasingly like all they had was UEFA's sloppy seconds.
Very good, but not sure of the star on the hat…Sorry - had a hell of a few days!!!! Here's Che Guardiola
View attachment 69165View attachment 69166
it was all over the press in 2019 it was covered in the CAS trial and we had proof of how it was opperatingUh... Jonathan Rowland and Fordham weren't brought up at CAS at all.
CAS was about sponsorships. This stuff is about image rights, not sponsors.
it was all over the press in 2019 it was covered in the CAS trial and we had proof of how it was opperating
Fordham was not covered in the CAS trial. I don't know how else you want it explained, it simply was not a part of it.
Man City 'launched secret project to shift player image rights cash'
Manchester City are alleged to have launched a secret project to shift the cost of player image rights to a third-party in a bid to escape Financial Fair Play penalties.www.dailymail.co.uk
of course it was here's an article asking UEFA to investigate it way before we were charged by them. It was covered and deemed nothing
this was already proved in CAS not to be an attempt to disguise payments so why is it being brought back up?