PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

That would have been the argument used by our lawyers. The PL can't go looking for a case to pursue. They have to have one when they ask for documents, emails, etc.

I could be wrong but it looks increasingly like all they had was UEFA's sloppy seconds.
Thanks for the explanation and for the numerous post pertaining to the matter.

Sloppy seconds is all they deserve.
 
The Premier league have been railroaded into this investigation by the Rags & Dippers , when Masters was appointed to his position at the Premier league it was alleged that the red 'istree clubs were asked for their approval of the appontement.
No doubt one of the questions to Masters at his interview was "What are you going to do about City", and we now have the answer. The fact that a self confessed Goon fanatical supporter will chair the investigation only makes this situation even more hilarious , (it reminds me of the Black Adder (Series 4) when Stephen Fry playing General Melchett was judge and jury for the murder of his plump pigeon)

Similar to UEFA , when they were under immense pressure from the "established" european clubs to take action against our club , the Premier league are doing exactly the same ,but including the hearing and any appeal i wouldnt be surprised if we have another three or four league titles under our belt before the spineless c*nts like Masters at the Premier league finally have their pound of flesh.

Possibly a points reduction and a transfer ban would be on the table to appease the jealous f*ckers in the Premier league who are in awe of how our superbly run football club mops up trophies,but talk of relegation and removing historical titles we have won are just the bullshit dreams and shit stirring of the media and club rivals clutching at straws.

Apologies for the long winded rant , but one last thing , if they relegated our club to the National league we will still have a 35000/40000 loyal core support who will never desert our club and we will bounce back , we have done it before.
"They" can try and kick our club into submission but "they" will NEVER EVER diminish our support ,lest we forget .............................we are city till we die ;)
 
Uh... Jonathan Rowland and Fordham weren't brought up at CAS at all.

CAS was about sponsorships. This stuff is about image rights, not sponsors.
it was all over the press in 2019 it was covered in the CAS trial and we had proof of how it was opperating
 
Fordham was not covered in the CAS trial. I don't know how else you want it explained, it simply was not a part of it.

of course it was here's an article asking UEFA to investigate it way before we were charged by them. It was covered and deemed nothing
 

of course it was here's an article asking UEFA to investigate it way before we were charged by them. It was covered and deemed nothing

this was already proved in CAS not to be an attempt to disguise payments so why is it being brought back up?


It was not covered in the CAS trial FFS.

We all know it was uncovered before then, that's what we've been discussing for the last 10 pages.

It was not covered by, or even mentioned, at CAS. It was no "already proved in CAS not to be an attempt..."

Instead of replying to me again to tell me that black is white, up is down, go and read the CAS report and search for Fordham and maybe you'll believe your own eyes when it's not there.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.