PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Good grief….anybody relying on the Football is Fixed nutcase for their info needs professional help.

I presume you are aware that he has written about some of current players being match fixing plants and a certain football agent being the shadowy puppet master of everything bent about football.
 
Sorry, I wasn't being serious with my previous answer.

Yes, a couple of our legal eagles have made those very points, although I wasn't clear if the fraud angle will be reviewed first to determine whether there is enough evidence to pursue the serious charge. If there isn't, then the alleged breach is time-barred, of course.

Our les also pointed out that the serious nature of the allegation of fraud means that the evidence has to be more cogent than with a normal breach, which is then a more difficult level to achieve.

I think. It's all pretty complicated for a simple accountant like me.

And yes, you do need to catch up to the dirty dossier.

The two points run simultaneously. If fraud is established, it (a) means the limitation period didn't start to run until they found out about the fraud (I am simplifying this) and (b) we are guilty of failing to provide accounts showing a true and fair picture of our finances.

The fact that the allegation of fraud is crucial in two separate respects is why this is a lot more high-stakes, on both sides, than even the media have reported.

And I've caught up with Dodge's dodgy dossier!
 
Ref wasn't too bad away at the Emirates last season.

And the Brentford equaliser against Arse. Surely if var was there to stop us winning the league they’d have found a way to disallow that?

I just think refs and var are shit and incompetent, and nothing to do with the vendetta against us which is purely from the ‘hateful 8 or 9‘ clubs whose boards are jealous of our spending and winning stuff so focussed on our spending.
 
Referees are incompetent. However I doubt they'd be so stupid to say something which they know would be picked up by broadcasters, etc.

It's possible that the OP may have been told something but I don't think the person who passed on that information is telling the truth.

It sounds very fanciful and convenient.
 
We had all this 3 years ago.




City were going to unload a mythical shit storm of material gathered on the cartel clubs.

Depending on the point of time, it was going to be timed to:

stop the UEFA investigation
derail Liverpool's title charge in January
blow things wide open during project restart in June
spoil their title celebrations in July
bring down UEFA entirely



Then the ban got overturned, all mentions of a super secret expose to uncover the villains behind the campaign against the club were forgotton, until another crisis point and suddenly it's back on the menu.

You must be able to see this is not real. It's wishful thinking packaged up perfectly to appeal to people on here. Not only is the club 100% innocent, it's going to be proven to everyone and all our enemies are going to be humiliated and their machinations revealed to the public! Too good to be true doesn't even begin to cover it.

It's always the same. The poster can't tell you any details. Or a date for when this might happen. Or who is involved...but you wait and see! Just keep waiting, any day now.



I completely understand the appeal, If we're sitting here in 10 days or 10 weeks time and it turns out it was real this time, and the "whistleblower of all whistleblowers" has brought down a conspiracy of everyone who looked at City the wrong way, then I'll be celebrating just as much as anyone. But come on, we can't keep falling for the same routine.

Yeah but lets be honest.. it's really awful at Anfield and Old Trashford.

So many bad calls against us in those venues over the last 5 years alone!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.