JWP1926
Well-Known Member
And the Lyon game and the spurs game and the UCL final. Could end up with 103 points in 17/18 and 3 European cups.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
And the Lyon game and the spurs game and the UCL final. Could end up with 103 points in 17/18 and 3 European cups.
Northerndave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jan 2020
- Messages
- 1,754
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Wasn't that at home, where Razza missed the header just before the half and we let them back into it 2nd half?If we have to replay games can we replay the derby where we were 2 up to win the league at the swamp but then lost 3-2?
Still angry about that.
Dodge
Well-Known Member
There's a matchday forum vibe to this thread me thinks...
The truth will out, chill bitches.
The truth will out, chill bitches.
Mayor West
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 9,918
Wasnt that at home?If we have to replay games can we replay the derby where we were 2 up to win the league at the swamp but then lost 3-2?
Still angry about that.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Given how disgusted he is with this, it makes you wonder where he was when UEFA chanced their arm.Ha, two posts
blue by birth
Well-Known Member
Or even better the one at homeIf we have to replay games can we replay the derby where we were 2 up to win the league at the swamp but then lost 3-2?
Still angry about that.
supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 13,433
From BBC
'City were not given advance warning of the Premier League statement. They were called at the same time the statement was published.'
I found that interesting. Not a surprise that happened, but it helps build our reasons for non-compliance. Quite like UEFA we'll challenge the reasoning behind the allegations and we'll have plenty of dirt to build the narrative that they're biased and that's why we didn't comply - things being leaked to the media etc.
Ultimately the impartial ruling will dismiss that, because they have to believe the system is fair and reasonable or what is the point of it? But if they do comment on those issues it's enough for us, and it will bring into question their methodology.
Wasn't that at home, where Razza missed the header just before the half and we let them back into it 2nd half?
No was at theirs. Should have rubbed their noses in it. Oh well.