oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
If you had any information on anything like that, I`m sure someone at City would give you a Blow Job.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Said on here before, Jack Gaughan is a Blackpool fan, went to school with my son's, and used to contribute to their match day programmes.Correct. As far as those who can be trusted or get steers.
The pool is very small.
Jack G, Martin Blackburn, Phil Thomas and Simon Mullock
Two are Blues, one is a red and another is a Blackburn fan.
All are top journos.
Outside the local patch, the higher ups do brief Ornstein, which doesn't sit well with me and I'm sure doesn't with those other lads.
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
Although I agree its more about cutting the balls off the plDon't see the latter. Glazers would not sell up if there were the slightest chance of English clubs breaking away again.
Too much money on offer.
This is about an independent regulator cutting the balls off the Premier League and FA.
Thus, cutting the balls also off United and the cartel clubs.
Can't enforce the status quo if the votes no longer count :)
Glaziers would be rubbing their hands with the thought of receiving between 4 & 6 billion without having to pay any of the loans back
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
Gniac thou & as trustworthy as an MP. He probably knew all about the Qatari wanting to buy the rags & thats why he's changed his tuneI found it interesting if my memory serves me right, Neville took a positive slant on City after we were charged and was quite sceptical of the validity of the charges- I personally think the Cartel know the days of manipulation are nearly over and have gone for it -
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,129
Who or what would/could have stopped all the hysteria in the press about the PL charges? It's gone incredibly quiet.
That, detective, is the right question.
As the FootballIsFixed guy has posted the information in his blog, I'll go live on it.
Among the information he passed on was that a number of people reporting to LFC were working in our Performance & Analytics team. My understanding is that a number of people were sacked soon afterwards. I also believe there was a 'war room' at Liverpool's HQ where these activities were coordinated from. However I believe we were already aware of this.
That's why I was so convinced something major would happen. I couldn't see how this wouldn't be a major scandal. But for whatever reason it's been 4 years and nothing. At least not yet.
Imagine going to all that effort just to be beaten to the title 4 times out of the last 5 - with the 1 having a Covid-sized asterisks next to it.
johnnytapia
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 10,606
We could get a local MP to discuss openly in House of Commons under Parliamentary Privilege.Can an organisation not file for a super injunction even if the press actually wanted to run with a story like this or does a SI have to be from an individual?
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
Like Pep has said, we had to be perfect, had we not it could have been very differentImagine going to all that effort just to be beaten to the title 4 times out of the last 5 - with the 1 having a Covid-sized asterisks next to it.
johnnytapia
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 10,606
No one has exposed anything. Exposing something would mean evidence of something at least, if not proof.
We've seen half a rumour and a refusal to expand on it at all, which makes it a conspiracy theory.
It's not Watergate, it's chemtrails, illuminati, Elvis is still alive type stuff.