PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Brightwell Bros.]

One of those Cockerney chaps from that there London was just reading this thread and told me there are some right Kants on here :-)

I propose we refer to our previous clearance of charges as the CASegorical imperative.

 

[The Light Was Yellow Sir]

Told our disclosure stuff will fill a decent sized skip.

That should keep people busy.

Is that the disclosure stuff that means we’re burying the investigation in paperwork or the disclosure stuff that means we’re not cooperating?…..

 

[wolviedinho]

Is that the disclosure stuff that means we’re burying the investigation in paperwork or the disclosure stuff that means we’re not cooperating?…..

Both I hope -:)

Why should we be helpful when they have unleashed bi partisan made up bullshit to aid our competition and damage the club?

Keep the skips coming, drag it out and fight over every sentence and interpretation of said sentence. They wanted a war well guess what? You have fucking got one now!

Not Guilty on any charge.

 

[halfcenturyup]

One of those Cockerney chaps from that there London was just reading this thread and told me there are some right Kants on here :-)

Yeah - 'Im an' who else?

 

[Maly]

An ignorant Tory…. There’s a thing.

I never knew you spelt politician like that ;)

 

[Chris in London]

Richard Madeley the renowned 20th century philanderer?

Fixed

 

[LeonardoDaVnci]

I'm no expert on Kant, but for what it's worth here are my thoughts on his failings...

I think Kant’s main mistake lies in the way he thinks about the relation between his theoretical and his practical philosophy. He thinks he can salvage the notion of freedom indispensable to his moral philosophy only by reintroducing as objects of faith the metaphysical truths he had denied as objects of knowledge, eg hacked emails. I think this is a confusing and unnecessary move, which sends him straight back into the pre-critical, metaphysical age he had wanted to break away from.

 

[Inter Me Nan]

I'm no expert on Kant, but for what it's worth here are my thoughts on his failings...

I think Kant’s main mistake lies in the way he thinks about the relation between his theoretical and his practical philosophy. He thinks he can salvage the notion of freedom indispensable to his moral philosophy only by reintroducing as objects of faith the metaphysical truths he had denied as objects of knowledge, eg hacked emails. I think this is a confusing and unnecessary move, which sends him straight back into the pre-critical, metaphysical age he had wanted to break away from.

 

[BrianW]

Every fool and his wife seem to deem themselves competent to judge City's case.

They aren't. They haven't even seen the evidence or the defence yet. And if both were put before us tomorrow, not one person in ten thousand would have the qualifications and experience to work their way through it and come to a just conclusion,

 

[Exeter Blue I am here]

I see Miggles has released one of his greatest hits rehash of his work on our CAS hearing, explaining why it was all wrong and that we will get a ban when the PL are finished with us. So tedious. Not going to link to it but it’s in the independent…

He’s still plugging the old “City picked 2 of the 3 CAS judges” shtick, I see……