PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[madloaf]

I'm no expert on Kant, but for what it's worth here are my thoughts on his failings...

I think Kant’s main mistake lies in the way he thinks about the relation between his theoretical and his practical philosophy. He thinks he can salvage the notion of freedom indispensable to his moral philosophy only by reintroducing as objects of faith the metaphysical truths he had denied as objects of knowledge, eg hacked emails. I think this is a confusing and unnecessary move, which sends him straight back into the pre-critical, metaphysical age he had wanted to break away from.

I'd also like to add my thoughts to this.

 

[BamberBridgeBlue]

If only Karl Marx had considered this too, there’d be fewer mass graves in the world. Somebody has to live in a Muscovite flat and somebody has to live in The Kremlin. Is it possible to exist in this realm without duality or hypocrisy?

 

[foggy1974]

Quite.. but I would suggest a few fellow Blues might gain insights by engaging with Kant's 'Ontological Argument' (and indeed Hegel's later stance on these matters), especially with regard to the position taken by Kant on the 'Barm vs Muffin Argument' (I gather he was firmly a 'Muffin Man')

 

[jim tolmies perm]

Aaah!
But can you have one without the other or are they one and the same.
I find these the existential, metaphysical, phenomenological, philosophical, supernatural, and transcendental questions thst need answering.
Frank Zappa said it best when he said;
"Some people... some people like cupcakes exclusively, while myself, I say
There is naught nor ought there be nothing so exalted on the face of god's grey
Earth as that prince of foods... the muffin!"

Thought it was a barm but it was a muffin...

 

[wolviedinho]

I'm no expert on Kant, but for what it's worth here are my thoughts on his failings...

I think Kant’s main mistake lies in the way he thinks about the relation between his theoretical and his practical philosophy. He thinks he can salvage the notion of freedom indispensable to his moral philosophy only by reintroducing as objects of faith the metaphysical truths he had denied as objects of knowledge, eg hacked emails. I think this is a confusing and unnecessary move, which sends him straight back into the pre-critical, metaphysical age he had wanted to break away from.

In theory we may have broken some “moral sporting” rules but practically they can’t prove it with hacked up emails. Fairness of the tribunal against (city) will come to a reasonable outcome in spite of certain traditional clubs.

 

[donkinho]

I'm no expert on Kant, but for what it's worth here are my thoughts on his failings...

I think Kant’s main mistake lies in the way he thinks about the relation between his theoretical and his practical philosophy. He thinks he can salvage the notion of freedom indispensable to his moral philosophy only by reintroducing as objects of faith the metaphysical truths he had denied as objects of knowledge, eg hacked emails. I think this is a confusing and unnecessary move, which sends him straight back into the pre-critical, metaphysical age he had wanted to break away from.

How did he ever find the time to record Play Away after deliberating all that stuff ???

 

[r.soleofsalford]

I'm no expert on Kant, but for what it's worth here are my thoughts on his failings...

I think Kant’s main mistake lies in the way he thinks about the relation between his theoretical and his practical philosophy. He thinks he can salvage the notion of freedom indispensable to his moral philosophy only by reintroducing as objects of faith the metaphysical truths he had denied as objects of knowledge, eg hacked emails. I think this is a confusing and unnecessary move, which sends him straight back into the pre-critical, metaphysical age he had wanted to break away from.

I’m fed up with reading stuff from kants

 

[halfcenturyup]

I'm no expert on Kant, but for what it's worth here are my thoughts on his failings...

I think Kant’s main mistake lies in the way he thinks about the relation between his theoretical and his practical philosophy. He thinks he can salvage the notion of freedom indispensable to his moral philosophy only by reintroducing as objects of faith the metaphysical truths he had denied as objects of knowledge, eg hacked emails. I think this is a confusing and unnecessary move, which sends him straight back into the pre-critical, metaphysical age he had wanted to break away from.

So you are saying he is a Kant?

 

[halfcenturyup]

I’m fed up with of reading stuff from kants

Or rsoles :)

 

[astevec]

While i enjoy the current philosophical debate, reality isn't as simple. Why has no-one even mentioned 'oven bottoms'?