PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

and yet no-one complains about the regulator(s) not following their own rules on timescales
I think the various Acts and decisions on time limitations allow for courts and tribunals to override time limitations, provided there is a special reason to do so.
Just from ancient memory that, no doubt an up to date lawyer can verify or deny that at the appropriate time.
 
I could have sworn there was mention of it but yeah, just had a look and can't see anything.
I think it’s just noise from rival fans using the narrative that we only got away with it because things were time barred, rather than no one knows what would have happened as they weren’t even looked at because they were irrelevant.
 
That Jordan bloke on TS seems to think that our case will drag on to 29/30 season.
He said that the case hearing will begin towards the end of 24, then there will be an appeal against the decision etc.
Suppose City are exonerated?
He never mentioned that.
C**t!
Posting that spaghetti-haired ****'s name on this thread should initiate an auto-ban.
 
How does the time scale for this compare with the timescale for expansion plans of CFG, The different parts of stadium plans, and general accounting bits and pieces? The more time passes the more stuff we win the more out of date and stupid any results would look if we where found guilty
 
One of the things i struggle to understand with these charges and it never seems to get mentioned is the inward investment from firstly the China media capital to the tune of £400 million in 2015 for a 13% stake in City and then Silverlake with a further £500 million investment for 13% in 2019 .. If you believe what the premier league charges are implying , the club were paying the likes of Mancini and Yaya Toure a few million off the books to comply with FFP , paying the likes of Etisalat (a multi billion pound turnover company) £12 million to sponsor us ...All this adds up to chump change compared to the £900 million inward investment between the years 2015-19 from CMC and Silverlake... Are they not allowed to use this money to buy players and count in our favour towards FFP ?.. if they are then surely it more than covers us financially for the most of the years in question , or are they including the inward investments into the charges ?.. or am i missing something ?..
 
That Jordan bloke on TS seems to think that our case will drag on to 29/30 season.
He said that the case hearing will begin towards the end of 24, then there will be an appeal against the decision etc.
Suppose City are exonerated?
He never mentioned that.
C**t!
You don't actually believe we will be exonerated first time without an appeal?

The thing is, we win the appeal then they can still cast as much doubt on us as possible without actually winning, then the 'City bought the appeal court off' tales start, no different than being cleared by CAS, not a single red shirted **** believes we were innocent and have played CAS like a lute and got away with it, classic excuse is the time-barred stuff they continue to pedal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PPT

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top