PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I’m probably basing it on the football daily podcast where the explanation was that City have maintained that they’ll beat the charges like UEFA but there is 115, the tone changed to explain that it’s 115 as if the more the stronger the case.
(Once again assuming we get a fair hearing) that’s simply not correct.

Try and look at it the other way - imagine how definitive having 115 charges dismissed would be!
 
I’m probably basing it on the football daily podcast where the explanation was that City have maintained that they’ll beat the charges like UEFA but there is 115, the tone changed to explain that it’s 115 as if the more the stronger the case.

I think it's fair to say that the sheer number of breaches enables the legally illiterate to explain how bad it is to the terminally stupid. Maybe it's the other way around. Terminally stupid people explaining how bad it is to the legally illiterate. Either way it involves terminally stupid and legally illiterate people. With a dash of clicks thrown in to support @gordondaviesmoustache 's point.
 
(Once again assuming we get a fair hearing) that’s simply not correct.

Try and look at it the other way - imagine how definitive having 115 charges dismissed would be!

I completely agree & look forward to the day but that’s not the narrative they are creating.

As you said about the “know nowt twat” giving the impression of loopholes when no such thing exists.
 
There’s a start of a great poem in there somewhere…finish it off kip

Maybe Kipling was thinking of Pep…..

If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too;
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or being lied about, don’t deal in lies,
Or being hated, don’t give way to hating,
 
The same nonces in the press that are making such a thing of the significance of the number of charges are the same cunts who will play up the significance of a single technical breach of the non-cooperation charge, whilst simultaneously ignoring the dismissal of the remaining charges that they presented as being so significant.

They will do whatever it takes to shift their narrative to suit their agenda.
 
I think it's fair to say that the sheer number of breaches enables the legally illiterate to explain how bad it is to the terminally stupid. Maybe it's the other way around. Terminally stupid people explaining how bad it is to the legally illiterate. Either way it involves terminally stupid and legally illiterate people. With a dash of clicks thrown in to support @gordondaviesmoustache 's point.

Beautifully explained
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.