PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[manimanc]

All these high end companies sponsoring us which the Premier League are accusing of fiddling the payments surely have to hit back and sue the Premier League for defamation of character.

 

[Ted_Bovis]

It will be very interesting if those who funded the YT video became known. It's obviously on YT rather than on TV because if it was on TV they would presumably have to disclose more information about who commissioned it. It's quite slick presentation so it obviously wasn't done on the cheap by amateurs. The fact that they are hiding its backers is a strong suggestion that it is part of the ongoing campaign against us, with the latest part of it seeking to delegitimise the findings of CAS. I would be very surprised if the video's funders are not connected to at least one of the red clubs. I think the aims are to keep the finger of suspicion pointing at us even if the 115 charges are dismissed. If/when that happens there will probably be another YT video from a similar source to explain why we're really guilty and why we only got off on a technicality. Sadly there will be no end to the accusations whatever happens.

It’s on YT because anyone can put anything and any old shite up there. It’s a lot more complex to get a TV program commissioned. I know it may seem like there’s a lot of utter shite on TV too but it’s somewhat more regulated for quality - from what cameras are used to the reason for the commission.

YT is easy. Anybody can upload a ‘documentary’ there.

 

[west didsblue]

It’s on YT because anyone can put anything and any old shite up there. It’s a lot more complex to get a TV program commissioned. I know it may seem like there’s a lot of utter shite on TV too but it’s somewhat more regulated for quality - from what cameras are used to the reason for the commission.

YT is easy. Anybody can upload a ‘documentary’ there.

Exactly my point

 

[Ted_Bovis]

Wrote something on Substack for anyone interested in the topic.

Conspiracy Theories and Innuendo will not prove the alleged Manchester City Conspiracy

There will be no Super Sub for cogent evidence

stefanborson.substack.com

Fabulous stuff Mr B. Shared it widely.

 

[Ted_Bovis]

Well said, thanks for taking the time to put that all together and explain the situation. Can you make a YouTube video? -:)

I could - I have lots of pro filming gear and I’m a fully trained video editor and ex-tv producer if Stefan was up for it I’d be happy to figure out how- but it will probably just make us look like we are nervous.

Silence and dignity way more powerful.

 

[Grassland Blue]

Yeah I am getting the feeling of so fkin what! They're going to throw this shit as long as we're too good for them. Lets hope for a fine, that will boil their heads so much.

If City are not guilty (as I believe) why should we accept a fine?
City should be suing for reputational damage if anything.

 

[wolviedinho]

I could - I have lots of pro filming gear and I’m a fully trained video editor and ex-tv producer if Stefan was up for it I’d be happy to figure out how- but it will probably just make us look like we are nervous.

Silence and dignity way more powerful.

We need as many voices on the socials as possible imo. City fans are outnumbered and drowned out by united, arsenal, Liverpool fans.

If anyone can get a YouTube channel going to fight back against the onslaught then they should try it. The more professional the better. Look how much traction that piers Morgan YouTube thing got.

few on here have mentioned doing it. We have enough legal, financial, and media minds to make a real go. Need @tolmie's hairdoo to help out with that probably.

Bluemoon members subscribe and follow then it will make waves. City Avengers Mobilise -:)

Only my opinion mind.

 

[cheekybids]

It’s on YT because anyone can put anything and any old shite up there. It’s a lot more complex to get a TV program commissioned. I know it may seem like there’s a lot of utter shite on TV too but it’s somewhat more regulated for quality - from what cameras are used to the reason for the commission.

YT is easy. Anybody can upload a ‘documentary’ there.

Possibly touted to TV & they’ve all said “not a fucking chance.”

 

[the talisman]

The YouTube documentary got a mention on ESPNFC by Gab Marcotti.
He wasn’t particularly interested in the “new” allegations but was more focused on who paid to make the documentary which was refreshing.

I’m paraphrasing but he basically said who hates Manchester City enough to fund this film…

I think we’d all like to know that

 

[halfcenturyup]

We didn't pick 2 from 3. We suggested the chair from the list. UEFA had no objection IF the CAS Court Office went with him. The CAS Court Office then picked him. At no point did City have any power to pick or select the Chair.

Ah yes, but UEFA had no objection because they were in on it for commercial reasons. It's easy, this conspiracy nonsense. You really can't win when people conflate fact and fiction.