halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,119
That’s what I thought.
Great article btw. I hope it gains a wider audience than just City fans.
Question: With regard to the emails. How did City explain to CAS the one that seemed to suggest that that a portion of a sponsor’s money came from ADUG? If I’ve remembered that correctly. It’s the one piece of “evidence” that I thought would be difficult to explain. Time barred?
These were the facts according to CAS:
And this was the club's submissions:
UEFA's submission was basically, yeah but it looks a bit fishy (my non-legal assessment).
CAS didn't comment on the merits (time-barred), but did hear evidence from the contract lawyer and a SVP of Etisalat: