Not the same with Mendy. That went to trial and he was found not guilty.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 16,273
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I do wonder, if we're found to have not breached rules, what our reaction would to to those reporters who have tried to destroy this club these last few seasons. It's quite personal to me tbh.
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 17,523
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Are some of these charges for allegedly breaching of rule that didnt exist at the time ?
Centurions
Well-Known Member
I think it's to do with the fact that the PL rushed through rules that effectively let's them go on a fishing trip and demand that clubs supply them with anything and everything they request regardless of relevance. These rules didn't exist when we're alleged to have broken the rules so we're arguing that we'll only give them what they would have been due before the new rules. Basically, they want us to do thier job for them and tie the noose ourselves.Are some of these charges for allegedly breaching of rule that didnt exist at the time ?
Maybe...
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
It really does expose the level of organised hate against MCFC. The pile on against city is unparalleled in sport. 2023 and you are not allowed to have a Muslim owner. Don’t matter if he regenerates half of east Manchester.Has that **** Nick Harris done a trophy table with asterisks against Chelsea and United yet?
Shirt not red.
Owner not white.
New money v old.
There is an awful smell embedded into top level sport.
HalfwayUpTheKippax
Well-Known Member
Do you mean Greenwood rather than Mendy?They don’t under the concept of being innocent until proven guilty. Their beloved family man Ryan had charges against him which went to court and then withdrawn from his accuser, same with Mendy. The whole world were desperate to see him jailed and life taken away from him because of who he played for.
They will do a Tebas, insisting that City are guilty and the panel is not fit for purpose. More worryingly, the PL know this and will be tempted to find City guilty to appease the redshirts and their sycophants.I do wonder, if we're found to have not breached rules, what our reaction would to to those reporters who have tried to destroy this club these last few seasons. It's quite personal to me tbh.
Asa's left peg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jun 2010
- Messages
- 3,985
- Location
- Sandbach via Rusholme
- Team supported
- Some team in the CFG
So if the Chelsea charges go back to 2012, can someone give me a total of charges over the period to the takeover? I'm sure it must be somewhere in the press.
Same as the Rags, no indication they were being investigated, no list of failures or charges, just a statement and token fine after they were found to be guilty of breaking the rules with the press desperate to include the words “minor breach” re the Rags even though no ne knows the figuresSo if the Chelsea charges go back to 2012, can someone give me a total of charges over the period to the takeover? I'm sure it must be somewhere in the press.
It really does expose the level of organised hate against MCFC. The pile on against city is unparalleled in sport. 2023 and you are not allowed to have a Muslim owner. Don’t matter if he regenerates half of east Manchester.
Shirt not red.
Owner not white.
New money v old.
There is an awful smell embedded into top level sport.
Shirt not red
Owner not white
Means all our trophies
Are a pile of shite.