PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

its embarrassing how simplistic the media make things with regards to related companies, in reality most companies are connected in some way and at some level, it would be almost impossible for any company to invest in literally anything without having some level of connection somewhere along the line and influence.

Permira who currently own teamviewer who are the main sponsors of united currently also do business with AIDA, so is that a related party to city, its impossible, they just flag up bits they want to when it suits them
 
mancboy said:
its embarrassing how simplistic the media make things with regards to related companies, in reality most companies are connected in some way and at some level, it would be almost impossible for any company to invest in literally anything without having some level of connection somewhere along the line and influence.

Permira who currently own teamviewer who are the main sponsors of united currently also do business with AIDA, so is that a related party to city, its impossible, they just flag up bits they want to when it suits them
Click to expand...
What you on about
 
WRicko said:
Why ask me ? Are you defending Wrexham or attacking City or me ? Half the championship probably still has deals with companies connected to there owners don’t know if any are considered related parties legally speaking or if they are market value or not but I don’t remember them ever being questioned like any of our deals. Ours are considered related party by the media at least just by being from the same country as our owner.

United airlines is clearly not related party but it does seem odd. Don’t you agree ? Wouldn’t it be considered odd if it was someone else ? I think so maybe it’s riding on the back of celb ownership but seems a bit flash in the pan if so ? I don’t know about the other company guessing also not related party. Again odd tho don’t you think ? Perhaps again just using celb ownership. Then the one they own must be related party but is it treated as such I don’t know ? Is it fair value I don’t know. Has it been flagged by the media no. Would it be if City yes
Click to expand...
Absolutely not attacking you or City. If anything I'm defending Wrexham using exactly the same arguments I would use to defend City
- that, if the sponsorship is not with a related party then what's the issue? The sponsor must feel it's worth it to them.
- if it is with a related party, then is it at market value? If it is, then again, what's the issue? They're allowed sponsorship with a related party if it's at market value.
Your posts seem to imply (at least to me) that you think there's something wrong/dodgy about these deals rather than them simply being a bit "odd"
I apologise if I've misinterpreted this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.