PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Keeper! said:
What a weak , joke of a society we have become when two teenage idiots are made to look important, relevant and represent a whole club.
Click to expand...
It's not society per se, it's the way the media portrays things.

I'm sure the vast majority of people, even the vast majority of rags, realise that these are just a pair of isolated numpties but the media has to get its pound of flesh
 
Axel Freed said:
It's not society per se, it's the way the media portrays things.

I'm sure the vast majority of people, even the vast majority of rags, realise that these are just a pair of isolated numpties but the media has to get its pound of flesh
Click to expand...
No it's society, and taking things
far too seriously.

Two pissed up teenagers thinking they were smart taking the piss, nothing more, nothing less.

Charlton was a footballing legend to a lot of people, and received respect he deserved.

But the constant refences to two idiots is simply not needed.
 
Last edited:
pride in battle said:
I remember when Chelsea came into the money, I was glad as it upset the rags and Arsenal & pool, more competition, same with Newcastle, can't understand the logic talking shite like we were some tin pot team before the take over...
Click to expand...
This is something I’ve always wondered about.

When we didn’t have a pot to piss in, I was always happy when someone challenged the top, and like you say when Chelsea came into money it made me happy because it would piss everyone off. So imagine my surprise when it happened to us and everyone hated us.

Very strange behavior but I guess that’s the power of relentless propaganda on the public’s perception
 
Keeper! said:
No it's society, and taking thing far too seriously.

Two pissed up teenagers thinking they were smart taking the piss, nothing more, nothing less.

Charlton was a footballing legend to a lot of people, and received respect he deserved.

But the constant refences to two idiots is simply not needed.
Click to expand...
Bang on.
 
The perfect fumble said:
He has a point....

Click to expand...

Always annoys me how the Wrexham takeover is portrayed.
Theirs is wonderful, great for the club, great for the fans and great for the town of Wrexham.
Ours is disgusting all round.
It’s either cos we’re taking trophies off the establishment or cos our owners are brown.
I suspect it’s abit of both.
 
I'm Blue said:
Always annoys me how the Wrexham takeover is portrayed.
Theirs is wonderful, great for the club, great for the fans and great for the town of Wrexham.
Ours is disgusting all round.
It’s either cos we’re taking trophies off the establishment or cos our owners are brown.
I suspect it’s abit of both.
Click to expand...
They're not a threat currently to the established order. We are.
 
I'm Blue said:
Always annoys me how the Wrexham takeover is portrayed.
Theirs is wonderful, great for the club, great for the fans and great for the town of Wrexham.
Ours is disgusting all round.
It’s either cos we’re taking trophies off the establishment or cos our owners are brown.
I suspect it’s abit of both.
Click to expand...
This..
 
The perfect fumble said:
He has a point....

Click to expand...

So saw the add and thought wait United airlines sponsors Wrexham ? Along with a whisky drink company connected to the owners and who is that on the training kit ? So had to check. So United airlines do sponsors Wrexham thought it was a joke about how big Wrexham are. United are the 3rd biggest airline in the world but don’t think I have ever used them other than internal flights in the US something most people in Wrexham UK or Europe do not do. The drinks
Company on the training kit is some American soda company that you cannot buy outside the US. Wrexham must be the lowest ranked side around with an international company on the shirt a training sponsors and or a sleeve sponsor which is a very new thing on football. It stinks.

Also just watching the Chelsea game and isn’t there something odd about their shirt sponsors
 
Last edited:
WRicko said:
So saw the add and thought wait United airlines sponsors Wrexham ? Along with a whisky drink company connected to the owners and who is that on the training kit ? So had to check. So United airlines do sponsors Wrexham thought it was a joke about how big Wrexham are. United are the 3rd biggest airline in the world but don’t think I have ever used them other than internal flights in the US something most people in Wrexham UK or Europe do not do. The drinks
Company on the training kit is some American soda company that you cannot buy outside the US. Wrexham must be the lowest ranked side around with an international company on the shirt a training sponsors and or a sleeve sponsor which is a very new thing on football. It stinks.

Also just watching the Chelsea game and isn’t there something odd about their shirt sponsors
Click to expand...
Are the deals with related parties, and if they are, are they at market value?
 
citizen_maine said:
They're not a threat currently to the established order. We are.
Click to expand...
And we’re much, much more than just a threat. We’re wiping them out, erasing their records and eclipsing their history. They fucking despise us because we’ve taken their favourite toy and smashed it into a thousand broken pieces.
Their whole house of cards, carefully built over twenty years, has fallen down. Lovely.
 
Rory Bluelow said:
And we’re much, much more than just a threat. We’re wiping them out, erasing their records and eclipsing their history. They fucking despise us because we’ve taken their favourite toy and smashed it into a thousand broken pieces.
Their whole house of cards, carefully built over twenty years, has fallen down. Lovely.
Click to expand...

Yep there treble was bettered by us we were champions they wasn't they could have stopped our Treble they couldn't! Be sweet to get four in a row leagues
 
citizen_maine said:
Are the deals with related parties, and if they are, are they at market value?
Click to expand...
Why ask me ? Are you defending Wrexham or attacking City or me ? Half the championship probably still has deals with companies connected to there owners don’t know if any are considered related parties legally speaking or if they are market value or not but I don’t remember them ever being questioned like any of our deals. Ours are considered related party by the media at least just by being from the same country as our owner.

United airlines is clearly not related party but it does seem odd. Don’t you agree ? Wouldn’t it be considered odd if it was someone else ? I think so maybe it’s riding on the back of celb ownership but seems a bit flash in the pan if so ? I don’t know about the other company guessing also not related party. Again odd tho don’t you think ? Perhaps again just using celb ownership. Then the one they own must be related party but is it treated as such I don’t know ? Is it fair value I don’t know. Has it been flagged by the media no. Would it be if City yes
 
its embarrassing how simplistic the media make things with regards to related companies, in reality most companies are connected in some way and at some level, it would be almost impossible for any company to invest in literally anything without having some level of connection somewhere along the line and influence.

Permira who currently own teamviewer who are the main sponsors of united currently also do business with AIDA, so is that a related party to city, its impossible, they just flag up bits they want to when it suits them
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top