Fred_Quimby
Well-Known Member
Correct. Keep saying it just gives the media more items to fill their back pages with and even more negative press.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Blue_Lightsaber
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Feb 2022
- Messages
- 2,635
- Team supported
- Man City
How long does it take to place an independent regulator anyways?
Bodicoteblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 5,903
If ‘being cunts’ is a chargeable offence ask him if he knows why his club haven’t been charged.I asked a dipper this at kids footy this morning.
“Being cunts” was his response.
I got off.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,250
It’ll be something to do with Merseyside’s Police force being blind.If ‘being cunts’ is a chargeable offence ask him if he knows why his club haven’t been charged.
LeonardoDaVnci
Well-Known Member
COULD WE FACE A COMPO PILE ON ?
Two rulings were published yesterday. The "other one" has gone under the radar. It was triggered by a formal complaint to the PL by five clubs and was also referred to an Independent Commission (IC).
The five clubs Inc Leeds, Burnley etc requested 2 rights.
1 To be active participants in the IC hearing against Everton. NOT ALLOWED.
2 To establish the right to claim compensation against EFC if found guilty of gaining a sporting advantage. ALLOWED.
According to PL rules the 5 clubs must submit their compensation claims within 28 days.
How many clubs have filed a complaint to the PL seeking compensation against MCFC just in case we are clobbered ?. Why is it not in the public domain. Eg Any club that finished 5th and missed out on a CL place.
if the club are now getting twitchy we may see signs of resilience planning. For example if KDB was transferred to Saudi in January for an amazing fee say £75M.
Two rulings were published yesterday. The "other one" has gone under the radar. It was triggered by a formal complaint to the PL by five clubs and was also referred to an Independent Commission (IC).
The five clubs Inc Leeds, Burnley etc requested 2 rights.
1 To be active participants in the IC hearing against Everton. NOT ALLOWED.
2 To establish the right to claim compensation against EFC if found guilty of gaining a sporting advantage. ALLOWED.
According to PL rules the 5 clubs must submit their compensation claims within 28 days.
How many clubs have filed a complaint to the PL seeking compensation against MCFC just in case we are clobbered ?. Why is it not in the public domain. Eg Any club that finished 5th and missed out on a CL place.
if the club are now getting twitchy we may see signs of resilience planning. For example if KDB was transferred to Saudi in January for an amazing fee say £75M.
Last edited:
FFP is now beneficial to us. The rags are snookered because of it.
The thing is the Premier League does not need United anymore, Manchester City and the others sell the TV rights.
It's now Haaland and City that Kids are talking about worldwide, City selling more and more Kits with Haaland and Grealish names on them,
The only thing United and Arsenal sell more off is YouTube hits, I Wonder Why
WTF is going on? Why are certain clubs trying to effectively put other clubs out of business? FFS its a sportTwo rulings were published yesterday. The "other one" has gone under the radar. It was triggered by a formal complaint to the PL by five clubs and was also referred to an Independent Commission (IC).
The five clubs Inc Leeds, Burnley etc requested 2 rights.
1 To be active participants in the IC hearing against Everton. NOT ALLOWED.
2 To establish the right to claim compensation against EFC if found guilty of gaining a sporting advantage. ALLOWED.
According to PL rules the 5 clubs must submit their compensation claims within 28 days.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
We haven't been found guilty of anything yet so they'd be a bit previous.Two rulings were published yesterday. The "other one" has gone under the radar. It was triggered by a formal complaint to the PL by five clubs and was also referred to an Independent Commission (IC).
The five clubs Inc Leeds, Burnley etc requested 2 rights.
1 To be active participants in the IC hearing against Everton. NOT ALLOWED.
2 To establish the right to claim compensation against EFC if found guilty of gaining a sporting advantage. ALLOWED.
According to PL rules the 5 clubs must submit their compensation claims within 28 days.
How many clubs have filed a complaint to the PL seeking compensation against MCFC just in case we are clobbered ?. Why is not in the public domain. Eg Any club that finished 5th and missed out on a CL place.
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
The non co operation part gets me thinking, I am assuming by non co operating they mean we failed to hand over financial records to the PL, now assume we are found not guilty of any of the other charges, surely this strengthens our argument to not provide the information requested,
No mate you’d still have to provide what was asked of you.