PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[kaz7]

One consequence of this when it's all over is that I would like our owners to select one individual and ruin them. I'm talking Pickfords moving what little shit they have left out of their salubrious home to some fucking sink estate whilst they watch with their crying wife and kids, who want to know why he didn't keep his flapping gums shut. Just one.

i am on board with that idea

 

[JewelZee]

It’s a breach either way, but the amount of money involved is absolutely critical to the gravity (and implications) of the offence.

Materiality...always matters, let's keep this real...

 

[lonestay]

One consequence of this when it's all over is that I would like our owners to select one individual and ruin them. I'm talking Pickfords moving what little shit they have left out of their salubrious home to some fucking sink estate whilst they watch with their crying wife and kids, who want to know why he didn't keep his flapping gums shut. Just one.

Who would it be ?

 

[Winchester]

Materiality...always matters, let's keep this real...

Zź sick of it all

 

[Gordyola]

The issue is auditors can only act on the information supplied, which we attest is a true & fair reflection.

Having said that, City would be blummin stupid to commit overt financial fraud in the UK, unlike ManUre who reregistered their company in a tax haven.

Again, this comes down to sovereign law & the rules of a private members club.

Flushing the loo after a dump might be a club rule, but it's not UK Law. That's as far as I can see this going.

It wasn’t long ago that golf clubs were claiming that as private members clubs they could excluded females members The high court said otherwise Rules have to be fair and in accordance with Uk law and can be tested legally if you have the cash

 

[abu13]

Is this correct that one of the reasons this is dragging on is that we were charged by the PL but they hadn't actually gathered the evidence for the charges and so now need additional time?

That has to be bollocks surely.

 

[applecentral]

Why so aggressive. OK your not being negative I thought it come over like that. Sorry you feel so offended. Fucking hell.

It feels like there is a lot of tension floating around here. Please remember we are all on the same side. Let’s try and be positive. Together we are a Behemoth. Seperated we are a Mouse!

 

[Stoned Rose]

What if the Premier League has a whistleblower or a disgruntled employee who had first-hand experience with the alleged fraudulent accounting....?

Then we are totally fucked beyond repair. It would surely mean jail time for our top executives.

Most Ill fitting username ever.

 

[Gordyola]

I don't know how 4 clubs can sue
Surely it can be only one. Considering you can make a loss of 105mil over 3 years Surely you only break that rule in the third year. For all we know Everton could have won the league in the third year and wiped out an losses in the last 2. Hence the team that finished 18th after the 3 years have a case but no one else

It’s a rolling 3 year period so, if like Chelsea have done you go out spending like mad in a year it means the previous 2 have to offset the mad year Newcastle are in a good position as Ashley rarely spent so they could make a big loss

 

[Goatmeal]

If and it a big if we get done for this. How much money would the club have dodged ffp by compared with Everton
From what I have read. Seems a few million not couple hundred mill