MCFCTrick
Well-Known Member
Asahi Super Dry was launched in 1987, I was in Japan then and recall the advertising promotions...
The clothing company was around 2000, non?
The clothing company was around 2000, non?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Brendan110_0
Well-Known Member
Superdry won't exist in 2025.This is free publicity for superdry. They know they have no case, they are just using this BS to advertise their brand worldwide, by linking up with Manchester City Football Team. This is free Advertising for them. Why sue Mancity when you are supposed to sue ASAHI? It's either they are complete morons or they are absolute genius for using this lawsuits as a Marketing ploy, if thats the case their MARKETING TEAM desrves a serious raise and substantial bonuses. They surely must know they have no case against CITY and for this false lawsuit, I hope CITY counter sue them.
P.S
I know how big superdry is and bluh bluh bluh
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Not free if they've employed lawyers? I have no idea how this works but if they really do put a case in, surely the courts won't look kindly on having their time wasted for a publicity stunt?This is free publicity for superdry. They know they have no case, they are just using this BS to advertise their brand worldwide, by linking up with Manchester City Football Team. This is free Advertising for them. Why sue Mancity when you are supposed to sue ASAHI? It's either they are complete morons or they are absolute genius for using this lawsuits as a Marketing ploy, if thats the case their MARKETING TEAM desrves a serious raise and substantial bonuses. They surely must know they have no case against CITY and for this false lawsuit, I hope CITY counter sue them.
P.S
I know how big superdry is and bluh bluh bluh
The international marketing is more expensive than their lawyers and besides, this wont drag on long enough for their lawyer fees to be expensive. Ok, let me ask, why are they specifically suing CITY instead of ASAHI?Not free if they've employed lawyers? I have no idea how this works but if they really do put a case in, surely the courts won't look kindly on having their time wasted for a publicity stunt?
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
It was a bit of both.That was spit, not semen.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
I've no idea, in fact I don't even know why you're asking me that question? That's why I wondered what the courts would make of it, I'm fairly certain they don't like being made use of.The international marketing is more expensive than their lawyers and besides, this wont drag on long enough for their lawyer fees to be expensive. Ok, let me ask, why are they specifically suing CITY instead of ASAHI?
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
This seems to be the done thing when bringing legal cases against us.They know they have no case
jimmygrimblesboots
Well-Known Member
If the media want to besmirch our sponsors why don’t they start with the Dippers. Standard Charter have been found guilty several times and have had multi-million pound fines for money laundering terrorists money from ISIS, Hamas and Al-Qaeda, but not one mention anywhere in the press that they are their sponsors.
If you want anymore proof of the stranglehold they have on the media then this is it, every single negative about them is brushed under the carpet. Nothing to see move along.
If you want anymore proof of the stranglehold they have on the media then this is it, every single negative about them is brushed under the carpet. Nothing to see move along.
I think the PL and Liverpool both use Bird & Bird Slicitors.This is a legal gravy train, surely.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Birds of a feather.I think the PL and Liverpool both use Bird & Bird Slicitors.