Spuds did this in 1994/95 ( I think).No, it means any appeal will involve suing them in the High Court. We would allege onerous behaviour, unfair practice etc. Its a double edged sword. If we won in HC, PL would be ordered to cancel the punishment and maybe rehear with an appeal rule in place. Also, they open up themselves to damages.
I love the togetherness that's happening here, come on blues this is just what's needed to get that seige mentally into gear, are we up for this ?
62 and don't care anymore fuck em
If they believed it was that serious they would have been obliged to report it and allow the SFO and HMRC investigate as they would need to hand over the evidence (if they have any).Exactly. If what the PL is saying we did is true, serious financial fraud, then I would expect criminal charges.
Gotta trust themHang ‘em all now and we will figure out if they’re guilty later…but I want anger NOW!!! FFS!!
Innocent until proven guilty is still a thing, right?
Until they’re found “guilty,” and even then I’m going to need to be convinced by the corrupt organization that is trying prove that guilt, I will support the organization that has enriched my sporting life since 2008 beyond any conceivable measure since I was born blue in 1963.
For some people, this has turned into a Match Thread and we are already 2-0 down at HT!!
Micah holds Chapman in the highest regards in his book. It shows the naivety of him who is just being used by the media.Given it a total swerve tonight with no Micah on. So you have two rags there Chapman and Dublin, Rory scouse Smith, and Sutton who hates us with a passion. I suppose Nedum was conveniently otherwise engaged as well
I got to page 180 on my lunch break
Anything new pages 181-365 or can I just pick up from here?!
Set Buzzer on them.I find the lack of anger/frustration with our own hierarchy on this thread mad. Soriano/Khaldoon need to answer serious questions to us.