lancs blue
Well-Known Member
That money has been laundered so often the colour has washed out of it.Liverpool still living off the Coutinho money ffs
That money has been laundered so often the colour has washed out of it.Liverpool still living off the Coutinho money ffs
But wouldn't part of the wage already be accounted for & offset against players leaving too?Is fine, as long as revenue goes up to cover it, but again the FFP costs will be fixed at +80 for each of the next five years, plus probably another 80 for wages. So revenue would have to go up by 160 to cover it. And not one-off revenue either, recurring revenue to cover each of the next five years' costs, even if they invest nothing more for the next five years.
Newcastle are a bigger club than Leicester, with far wealthier owners who're he'll bent on making a splash in global football.The point is it's not sustainable look at Leicester won the league now in championship!
Only way to stay at the top is finish top 6 minimum get better sponsors and keep getting top 6 push for top four! Unless you have a manager like pep and Klopp you need to be lucky!
Heard it's a facebook circulated table so no, don't think its legit at all. Guesswork
Newcastle are a bigger club than Leicester, with far wealthier owners who're he'll bent on making a splash in global football.
Unlike City, Newcastle have got a template to follow & can learn from our errors too. It's a lot easier following the path that others made beforehand, than being the pioneer.
Yeah im with you. Unambitious owners who found it easier to appease the supporters by voting for ffp and saying, “yeah we cant spend cos of ffp innit” rather than dipping their hands in their pocketsIts in their DNA to shift the goalposts as far as City are concerned but our revenue and projected revenue is a comfort zone where we will unlikely fail FFP. What I am saying, and maybe I wasn't clear, is that I will no longer argue against FFP on behalf of other clubs and certainly not argue on the behalf of any of the hateful 8/9. They were happy to get on board writing to UEFA to punish City, and backing the red tops and spuds lobbying the Premier League to bring the charges. So feck 'em, let them paddle their own canoe like we have had to do for 15 years against the tide of a negative agenda followed by every media outlet and journalist with the exception of Martin Samuels.
I’m actually pissing myself.
Gallagher is a Chelsea academy product, so any sale fee for him is banked as pure profit on the books.
However, he doesn't want to leave, Poch doesn't want to sell him & he's very popular with the squad. This could get very tasty. Popcorn bucket time.
View attachment 103834
Not having blanketly as a real word.Newcastle got to the CL with mostly mid-top table players. That's a decision individual players would have to make, so it couldn't be blanketly applied I'd imagine.
The point is if better players earned Newcastle a higher league finish (minus a 20 point deduction), the following season they'd have a far stronger squad & would be starting from zero like everyone else.