PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

The PL will have to prove that we knowingly accepted money from Etihad that we knew had been provided by ADUG. But CAS kicked that claim into the legal equivalent of Row Z.
Albeit for reasons that aren’t clear at the moment, Ceferin has now come out and essentially said CAS got it wrong and City were bang to rights, so there is certainly a non-zero chance the PL tribunal finds differently to CAS.
 
Albeit for reasons that aren’t clear at the moment, Ceferin has now come out and essentially said CAS got it wrong and City were bang to rights, so there is certainly a non-zero chance the PL tribunal finds differently to CAS.
What Ceferin did or didn't say will have zero impact on what evidence the lawyers on the PL commitee find or don't find.
 
Remember what CAS reported after they found City not guilty. The panel felt like there was an element of a witchhunt being waged against our club or words to that affect.
Correct, there is specific language in CAS's post hearing report stating that some of the charges against us were spurious...
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.