PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Centurions]

Where does that put Liverpool who hacked are computers.

The PL did look into it (and probably knew at the time TBH) but both clubs decided to put it to rest. I do wish some posters on here could do that and move forward. Whataboutery posts are boring as fuck and irrelevant.

 

[Centurions]

Collusion in plain sight though.

Not really, they needed to know how to plan for the following season(s) and fully expected us to delay and delay. As it happened that wasn't what happened or what we wanted. I for one can understand their reasoning and it was all done via the correct route and not via the media.

 

[waspish]

The PL did look into it (and probably knew at the time TBH) but both clubs decided to put it to rest. I do wish some posters on here could do that and move forward. Whataboutery posts are boring as fuck and irrelevant.

We was fair as a club kept it quiet got a million moved on! Then they go after us with venom a never ending narrative! They didn't play fair!

 

[Centurions]

In relation to:
3) Rules that require clubs to comply with UEFA’s FFP regulations, covering 2013/14 to 2017/18,

Why were united not charged by the premier league when they failed uefa ffp?
If its a PL rule that you must pass uefa ffp then surely they have failed and should be charged.

I don't think that's it's not passing FFP that is the charge, I'd have thought it's the failure to co-operate and alleged hiding of funds which them lot weren't charged with. Don't get caught up in whataboutery bollocks.

 

[cheekybids]

I don't think that's it's not passing FFP that is the charge, I'd have thought it's the failure to co-operate and alleged hiding of funds which them lot weren't charged with. Don't get caught up in whataboutery bollocks.

I think whataboutery is relevant to discuss at times but I agree it’s no defence, I believe we can defend ourselves.

However I do think it’s ok to discuss on a forum if you believe there’s a case for others to answer. We know how clubs have colluded & then when you see charges around treating other clubs fairly. It sticks in the throat….

 

[Gone for a Burton]

It's no good coming from Khaldoon, it needs to be a investigative journalist who has the balls to put his whole future on the line,as the cartel will come after him and try and destroy him as they have tried with us.
I'm not sure such a character exists in modern day journalism.

I'll do it...with eloquence and charm.

It'll fuck the bastards right over !!

 

[mimicmickmickdoyle]

The PL did look into it (and probably knew at the time TBH) but both clubs decided to put it to rest. I do wish some posters on here could do that and move forward. Whataboutery posts are boring as fuck and irrelevant.

What you mean is the Premier League looked into it and thought fuck it it's Liverpool let's move on.

 

[halfcenturyup]

IIRC you posted something ages ago suggesting something like this. I thought at the time it was a good idea.

I think it should start with these 2:
Do they represent fraud?
If it's fraud why isn't this in a criminal court?

I don't think these points have been mentioned yet... :) only joking

Serious point, and as suggested by you in your conversation with Dribble, is that it should be clear what is fact and what is opinion.

:) I did and nobody was interested then, either. People seem to be happier asking the same questions over and over again. More traffic for the site, at least.

Never mind, I doubt Ric would pay my hourly rate anyway :D

 

[SatOnTheWall]

Maybe Martin Samuel’s could write a book about it - he’s the only sports journalist I can think of who appears to be non-partisan and has any integrity.

Agreed, now that Andrew Jennings is sadly no longer with us.

 

[Rory Bluelow]

David Gill is the one opposing him,and we are all know what a fine upstanding character he is.

Ceferin > (****) Gill any day of the week.