PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Jam Tomorrow]

here we go again changing the rules to suit the scum

don’t they need a super majority of 14/6 to bring this in? If the turkeys want to vote for Christmas it’s up to them. on the face of it, shouldn’t impact us, unless there is something in the small print about clubs called Manchester City.

 

[Bald fraud]

here we go again changing the rules to suit the scum

All to pull up the drawbridge if they manage to get rid of us. They’ll make sure we never come back

 

[deano ou812]

here we go again changing the rules to suit the scum

Simply just vote against it,but as we have seen with voting before on certain things,some are either to thick to realise what it means,happy just to be in the premier league collecting tv money or will be pressured into voting for it ..

 

[The Future’s Blue!]

here we go again changing the rules to suit the scum

Are they talking about including debt in these calculations. Let’s say, any debt is to be subtracted from the % of turnover, so if you have 80% turnover of £300 mil and debt of £200 mil, then your maximum spend is limited to £100 mil. The rest can go towards paying off the debt.

But, we all know that this wouldn’t ride with the Red tops because it’s not about any form of sustainability, it’s all about stopping them being usurped at the trough.

 

[city2]

Are all the other clubs oblivious to the bigger picture.

 

[failsworthblueboy]

I've had some halfwit on Facebook, inform me that there is actually 293 charges .the rest will be delta with after the first batch. I've asked him to inform Lord pannick kc . And can he say what these other 178 charges are? European contingent is the reply ?? There are79 charges we will be unable to deny and WHEN we are found guilty the outcome will be bad , You couldn't make it up?

Somebody did lol.

 

[schfc6]

here we go again changing the rules to suit the scum

Ha ha, not even hiding it now.

 

[Blueknows]

Are all the other clubs oblivious to the bigger picture.

They were about ffp and are only just realising

 

[schfc6]

Are all the other clubs oblivious to the bigger picture.

Depends what you deem bigger picture? The American owned clubs will see this as a chance to close the shop even more. Take Bournemouth for example. Their revenue compared to a promoted club will theoretically keep the gap. Teams who come up simply won’t be able to compete with the established.
Thus closing the shop. Bournemouth aren’t looking up. They’re looking back.

United, Liverpool, Chelsea & Spurs want to close the door on Villa and Newcastle.
But Bournemouth, Wolves, Brentford etc will want to close the door on Leeds, Burnley, Luton, Southampton etc.

 

[Damanino]

many owners clearly happy with the PL revenues, the status of being a PL club owner, and the fact they can vote for saving their own ass in a way not really allowing for any ambitious other club to grow quickly let alone someone coming from Championship all of a sudden become a force.
on top of this with these rules they can always point at the rules when asked for spending more etc.

how mike Ashley would love these stricter rules...