HelloCity
Well-Known Member
You should consider doing something about these comments. You’re a professional and also now have some presence in the media. These comments could impact future work offerings.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
You should consider doing something about these comments. You’re a professional and also now have some presence in the media. These comments could impact future work offerings.
blue by birth
Well-Known Member
Take the **** to the cleaners mate..Lie 3 is clearly libellous I'd say. It is an outright lie and carries an inference seeking to damage my reputation. I don't think it is even debatable.
He needs his bollocks nailing to a table
Exeter Blue I am here
Well-Known Member
Ha ha, yes, it would appear that I severely underestimated his capacity for cuntiness!It didn't even take him that long!
Last edited:
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
he'll more than likely get more work out of it as people will watch and laugh at him going on with himselfHe's an absolute barmpot. How can he have a civilised discussion with someone then hours later go on social media and turn everything around!!
I hope that other podcasts have noted what a bitter and twisted bellend this character is and stay well away. He's absolutely delusional.
Lie 3 is clearly libellous I'd say. It is an outright lie and carries an inference seeking to damage my reputation. I don't think it is even debatable.
I've felt a bit sorry for him in the past, even though he copied a section of a rant I had about him on here and posted it on his Twitter page. Obviously it was twisted to infer I was sending him abuse when it was nothing of the sort. I was just expressing the view many have that the club should sue him, albeit worded a bit more strongly lol. He said a sympathetic City fan sent it to him but I believe he pops on here himself.
The man seems to have a pathological hatred of all things City and anything or anyone related to City. It's very strange, I wonder why?
@projectriver , you're the legal man, but I don't think you can let what he's tweeted go. It could do irreparable damage to your reputation and career.
Bellamy's Caddy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 4,506
Lie 3 is clearly libellous I'd say. It is an outright lie and carries an inference seeking to damage my reputation. I don't think it is even debatable.
Fairy play mate, I've seen a few of your interviews and you represent yourself and City fans really well. You're measured, articulate and professional in how you conduct yourself, unfortunately not everyone holds themselves to the same standards and as other posters have mentioned, it's no surprise that the nonsense NH is now spouting on twitter wasn't put forward to you directly during the interview as he knows you'd have run rings around him.
crystal_mais
Well-Known Member
I would seriously consider taking him to court and ensure he has retracted the comments and called out they were lies. Defamation of character i assume, although I'm no legal guruLie 3 is clearly libellous I'd say. It is an outright lie and carries an inference seeking to damage my reputation. I don't think it is even debatable.
richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 27,939
Lie 3 is clearly libellous I'd say. It is an outright lie and carries an inference seeking to damage my reputation. I don't think it is even debatable.
absolutely mate! I`d personally go after him for that
Prior to the game at Luton last night, I did and reacted exactly as you did - listened to the full podcast; thought Stefan handled calmly and brilliantly each and every attempt to accuse City of some level of wrong-doing; and gave Harris credit for responding to the debate in a polite manner.It’s astonishing to read Harris’s Twitter output (via Stefan’s replies as Harris has blocked me) after having listened to the podcast. Stefan’s measured legal objectivity demolished Harris’s attempts at sensationalism but, fair dos, Harris was polite enough during the podcast.
However Harris’s wilful refusal to understand the concept of a litigation settlement and his subsequent pathetic attempts to belittle Stefan on Twitter and his frankly childish and embarrassing use of emojis totally undermines his credibility.
Whether or not City have breached the rules, Harris’s opinions on the subject are utterly worthless.
What a strange person he must be.
Now, to read the subsequent Twitter posts that Harris has put into the public domain regarding Stefan's contribution to the discussion, together with (it seems to me) some rather random, unsubstantiated claims about his employment history, has frankly astonished me too.
Harris clearly isn't a full shilling..
richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 27,939
You should consider doing something about these comments. You’re a professional and also now have some presence in the media. These comments could impact future work offerings.
Totally agree mate