PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

mosssideblue said:
Lots of info on here which I don’t really understand so, in layman’s terms, are we in the shit or not?
Click to expand...
I can 100% confirm that we are absolutely not in the shit regarding certain aspects that may or may not have been discussed at length in the PL investigation, of which our lawyers know almost next to nothing and everything about, thereby proving our innocence regarding the original claim which hasn't yet been confirmed to be false, pending a full hearing of which we can catagorically deny may or may not turn out in our favour, depending on full interpretation of the results of the findings that could show that our dealings were above board at the time when they were legally acceptable yet could contrarily be seen as being underhanded, although this has not been confirmed.
 
Metal Biker said:
I can 100% confirm that we are absolutely not in the shit regarding certain aspects that may or may not have been discussed at length in the PL investigation, of which our lawyers know almost next to nothing and everything about, thereby proving our innocence regarding the original claim which hasn't yet been confirmed to be false, pending a full hearing of which we can catagorically deny may or may not turn out in our favour, depending on full interpretation of the results of the findings that could show that our dealings were above board at the time when they were legally acceptable yet could contrarily be seen as being underhanded, although this has not been confirmed.
Click to expand...
Finally some clarity.
 
Metal Biker said:
I can 100% confirm that we are absolutely not in the shit regarding certain aspects that may or may not have been discussed at length in the PL investigation, of which our lawyers know almost next to nothing and everything about, thereby proving our innocence regarding the original claim which hasn't yet been confirmed to be false, pending a full hearing of which we can catagorically deny may or may not turn out in our favour, depending on full interpretation of the results of the findings that could show that our dealings were above board at the time when they were legally acceptable yet could contrarily be seen as being underhanded, although this has not been confirmed.
Click to expand...
Bloody hell Biker. I was confused before, don’t do this to me please
 
The podcast must have passed me by completely because I don't have an x account and the platform is now inaccessible to me(thanks Elon).

I have just listened to it, but regarding Nick's tweets shared here first. It was surprising to me, how differently he behaves on twitter vs the podcast. Which strengthens my belief that twitter just isn't healthy for some people. It might not just be as simple as City being successful on and off the pitch, that has shot his bitter mind into pieces. Maybe, it's his relationship with the platform he likes to represent himself on, as some hero to football too. Maybe, someone close to him could try and suggest he comes off there for a while(and stop obsessing about City ,while he's at it, but we're just too good and too massive to ignore now, so that wont happen). Then again, maybe that's just who he is behind the mask?

His comments directed towards Stefan via twitter afterwards are that of a childish troll. Pointless snide remarks, that get his argument nowhere, derision, emoji spam and "LOL" to finish off his masterpieces(has to be in caps, to show how much FUN he's totally having... not fuming at all).
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.