halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 9,569
The ideas are so vague that if any club challenges in court a ruling against them by the PL as being contract interference, the club will win. How does the PL prove that a deal has not been assessed for fair market value by the club? That would be an early question to the PL witness to which they would have no satisfactory answer. “ We compared the deal of the treble winners to a deal by Sheffield United” Pah!
I can see them looking in their sponsorship databank and saying the Etihad deal should be at the same level as United's 1999 sponsorship :D
But yes, the whole thing is on pretty flimsy ground. They don't just want to disallow any income over their fair value estimate from the PSR profits/losses, they actually want a club to repay sponsorship money if they think it's above fair value. It really is madness.