I think what is interesting that the PL rules stipulate that they require a statement from a director (or equivalent) of the sponsoring company to say that the deal is at fair market value. In PL terms they want a statement from one plotter that there is no plot!. It may be fair to point out that City and Etihad produced documentary evidence that City performed everything they had been contracted to perform and that Etihad paid what they had agreed to pay. So City don't seem to have a problem. The PL might, though, if it persists with its categorisation of associated parties and deals. The independent regulator may also wish to know why the PL is determined to stop money coming into the game when it is needed quite desperately. But then it might also wish to know why the sustainability of a growing number of clubs is put at risk by points deductions in the name of profitability and sustainability .....
Yep, we want you to be sustainable by not letting you have a multi million pound deal that will enable you to compete, instead you can have 500k and be happy. What sort of universe are they living in.I think what is interesting that the PL rules stipulate that they require a statement from a director (or equivalent) of the sponsoring company to say that the deal is at fair market value. In PL terms they want a statement from one plotter that there is no plot!. It may be fair to point out that City and Etihad produced documentary evidence that City performed everything they had been contracted to perform and that Etihad paid what they had agreed to pay. So City don't seem to have a problem. The PL might, though, if it persists with its categorisation of associated parties and deals. The independent regulator may also wish to know why the PL is determined to stop money coming into the game when it is needed quite desperately. But then it might also wish to know why the sustainability of a growing number of clubs is put at risk by points deductions in the name of profitability and sustainability .....
The ideas are so vague that if any club challenges in court a ruling against them by the PL as being contract interference, the club will win. How does the PL prove that a deal has not been assessed for fair market value by the club? That would be an early question to the PL witness to which they would have no satisfactory answer. “ We compared the deal of the treble winners to a deal by Sheffield United” Pah!“All reasonable care” and “Fair Market Value”. This is going to be fun. The Premier League has lost the fucking plot - all on the back of benefitting just four “special” clubs. I wonder if it’s sinking in yet how the smaller clubs are being fucked over. No problem for our City though..that horse has bolted, leaving behind just a steaming pile of shit and an open stable door :)
Why don't city ask the PL if their barclays sponsorship is over valued. I think Barclays would want the best team in the world to be lauded not destroyed by the pricks they are sponsoring. I think they are due a refund.Yep, we want you to be sustainable by not letting you have a multi million pound deal that will enable you to compete, instead you can have 500k and be happy. What sort of universe are they living in.
Ziegler has jumped the shark. His endorsed that “scandal”video (in which almost every ‘fact’ was wrong) without checking its provenance which was carefully concealed by whoever paid for it.i wouldnt be so sure with these shit bags in charge and again Zieglar gets the leak
And unquantifiable (is that even a word?)"fair value" is subjective
“And what, City, did you do to ensure the AbuDhabi associated sponsorships were fair market value?”One thing the clueless fans accuse us of is having inflated sponsorships from Abu Dhabi based companies.
When ours don't get marked down, that shuts that argument up.
That is the bottom line. Well said.He can be as powerful as he wants to be. The clubs aren't in charge of what gets discussed at the meetings. He is. They aren't responsible for presenting documentation to the meetings, he is. If there is something asked for by the clubs which goes against the spirit of competition or that he thinks will be challenged on the grounds of illegality, he should be strong enough to say no and the clubs can vote him out if they don't like it.
He is a patsy. Platini was a patsy as well and that is how all this shit started. Ceferin, at least, has some balls. Masters needs to grow some before the PL is in big trouble in the courts. One way or another, he won't be around much longer, he must know that. He should stand up, show some backbone and do what is right for once in his miserable existence.
The ideas are so vague that if any club challenges in court a ruling against them by the PL as being contract interference, the club will win. How does the PL prove that a deal has not been assessed for fair market value by the club? That would be an early question to the PL witness to which they would have no satisfactory answer. “ We compared the deal of the treble winners to a deal by Sheffield United” Pah!
For some of our rivals and most of the press, a fraudster is Khaldoon wearing his Arab dress.What does someone on the swag look like ?
Cue pics of criminals in striped clothing, masks & holding a bag of swag ha