Not necessarily. Masters is a weak and uninspiring man, whose only value is to let the slender majority of Premier League clubs dominate him.
Richard Scudamore never allowed himself to be used in this way.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Richard Scudamore never allowed himself to be used in this way.
Gaylord du Bois
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 29,262
- Location
- Great Umbrage.
- Team supported
- Glory Hunting Blue. Was Chelsea.
You think so ?Richard Scudamore never allowed himself to be used in this way.
Scudamore was the one who grew the Premier League into the juggernaut it is today and gifted those owners such incredible revenue streams. He was far too valuable for them to push around in the same way they do with Masters.You think so ?
COAT_OF_ARMS
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2011
- Messages
- 639
What steps did Richard S take at any point to prevent this outcome? Seems to me he held the gates open at every interval.Not necessarily. Masters is a weak and uninspiring man, whose only value is to let the slender majority of Premier League clubs dominate him.
Richard Scudamore never allowed himself to be used in this way.
Bald fraud
Well-Known Member
That kaveh bloke was on before with Mike wedderburn both in agreement that the rules are only there to protect the old guard and are anti competitive. The tide is definitely turning if that wanker is now saying it!Sky now finally acknowledging that the charges against us are not the same as breaking P&S.
That Kava prick just rolled his eyes and said the 115 go way back and city deny any wronging.
Maybe the penny has dropped behind the scenes. Definitely feel a different tone in the air surrounding city. The attack dogs have gone quiet.
The anger was of epic proportions for a while which is disgusting in itself.
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
Scudamore said some telling things in the mediaNot necessarily. Masters is a weak and uninspiring man, whose only value is to let the slender majority of Premier League clubs dominate him.
Richard Scudamore never allowed himself to be used in this way.
The Colonel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 2,038
And sweet. It’s like dessert pizza. Must target young tastes.It is massively over price.
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
well they had meeting last monday and i guess loads of other meetings before that but they never thought of saying these rules are anti competiive untill effects them ?Not Forest, they weren't in the EPL at the time. I'm not really interested in a kind of karmic reap-what-you-sow approach to the issue anyways, there's more important things at stake, and crucially the law isn't concerned with that sentiment either. It's irrelevant who voted for it and who voted against, the nature of the framework is still anti-competition and it's the organisation that proposed it that is ultimately culpable.
oh it's ok there designed to stop city thats ok then
Scudamore said some telling things in the media
The bits he said out loud about needing a strong united and about having a new winner every 6 years?
True, pretty odd comments. Even odder is how the media never really questioned any of the comments...
Last edited:
Bald fraud
Well-Known Member
I hope every blue boycotts their overpriced shite.
Rags and dippers back to winning for the rest of time would be my guess.Everything in that statement confirms that City were right to fight against this incompetent/biased group.
I honestly don't know what the PL are trying to accomplish.