PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

paulchapo said:
I agree, while understanding why they act this way, we need a leader to be visible and fight our corner with the scum media. A once a year address doesn't really cut it. Pep has done a fantastic job but I feel sorry for the fucker handling all those cunts on his own.
Click to expand...
Yeah get Gary Cook back he’d be straight on the front foot with the cnuts in the media..
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
The two aren’t mutually exclusive and in my estimation he is unquestionably useless.

Firstly, he was picked after others were appointed and subsequently inexplicably resiled from taking the role. That is very telling imo, given the profile and responsibility attached to the job. Being offered a such a job then walking away is highly unusual. For it to happen more than once, truly exceptional. This demonstrates that he wasn’t objectively the ‘best’ candidate and also that he was likely prepared to operate in a way the others weren’t - but that doesn’t stop him being useless.

Secondly, he has spectacularly miscalculated with regards to these charges against City and has placed the PL in a wholly unnecessary and invidious position. This demonstrates extremely poor judgement and lack of vision, both loudly proclaiming his uselessness.

Thirdly is the wider way the financial rules are currently playing out within the most successful sporting brand in human history, on his watch. He is presiding over a farce in relation to financial restrictions within the most commercially successful sporting product on the planet. That is actually absurd and further underlines his uselessness.

Fourthly, I’ve seen and heard him talk. A conspicuously unimpressive and uncharismatic man. Not someone who I think is remotely suited to a role that is palpably considerably above his talents.

In short, he is a useless ****.
Click to expand...

Brilliant and spot on. He's taken the best product in world football and ruined it. If it carries on in this way English clubs will be championship level once more in Europe. As for a regulator, if whoever is appointed does as good a job as the absolute fuckwits running the country football really is fucked.
 
mancboy said:
In football many people have made many millions from being useless cunts, Rashford im looking at you.
Click to expand...

I’m thinking of people who are placed in positions of power & come across so incompetent that they just think he’s a buffoon & yet they should be judged purely on the results & as if they are competent.

1711147497300.gif
 
bluenova said:
But the idea isn't to encourage losses - it's to accept that they may occur, but to try and minimise them.

It makes sense for it to be higher when the rules are introduced, as clubs will have contracts with players, outstanding transfer fees etc.

Increasing the amounts involved would suggest that losses are fine.

To put the £213m that Kieran Maguire mentions in context; while it's not enough to help any club compete with the top Premier League clubs, it's still a significant amount to lose. There are only twenty football clubs in the World with yearly revenues higher than that figure.
Click to expand...

You’re all wrong……

It was probably just in case the Rags had losses around this amount. There hasn’t been a single rule created that hasn’t started from maintaining them at the top so we should assume that was the reason for this also.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.